Science, Censorship and Humanity

 There is a lot of information on Telegram that is censored on mainstream platforms. I am constantly in awe when engaging in conversation with”normies” how little they know about what’s going on , even if they are medical professionals..they never learned to Question Authority as we did growing up in the 70’s.



KongenErNøgen, [19.07.21 21:12] https://t.me/humansfirst
♦️🏛 — 🧛‍♂️💉☠️#️⃣ —- THE TRUE NUMBER OF VACCINE DEATHS IN USA? —- Attorney Files Lawsuit Against CDC Based on “Sworn Declaration” from Whistleblower Claiming 45,000 Deaths are Reported to VAERS – All Within 3 Days of COVID-19 Shots. This would be significantly greater than what the CDC is currently reporting, which is 10,991 deaths.

July 19, 2021 — Ohio-based Attorney Thomas Renz was one of several speakers this past weekend at a conference in Anaheim, California, where he announced that with the help of America’s Frontline Doctors, he was filing a federal lawsuit in Alabama based on a “sworn declaration, under threat of perjury,” from an alleged whistleblower who claims to have inside knowledge of a cover-up of reported deaths filed with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which is operated by the CDC.

This whistleblower has allegedly claimed, under oath, that there are at least 45,000 reported deaths that have occurred within 3 days of receiving a COVID-19 “vaccine.” Renz states that this report of 45,000 deaths is just from “one system” that reports to VAERS.

This would be significantly greater than what the CDC is currently reporting, which is 10,991 deaths, and many of those are beyond 3 days following the shots.


Renz also states that he believes Google, Facebook, and Twitter are “complicit with causing death” due to their censorship, and he stated “I cannot wait to sue you, over and over again.”

https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/07/19/vaers-whistleblower-45000-dead-from-covid-19-vaccines-within-3-days-sparks-lawsuit-against-federal-government/

KongenErNøgen, [28.07.21 14:16] https://t.me/humansfirst
🇺🇸 🔎🦠- THE CORONA TESTS – USA: CDC withdraws the temporary approval of the PCR test

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) withdraws the temporary approval of the Real-Time RT-PCR test, commonly referred to as the PCR test. This is stated on the website of the CDC , where they write:

Audience: Individuals Performing COVID-19 Testing – Level: Laboratory Alert

After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.

Visit the FDA website for a list of authorized COVID-19 diagnostic methods. For a summary of the performance of FDA-authorized molecular methods with an FDA reference panel, visit this page.

In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season. Laboratories and testing sites should validate and verify their selected assay within their facility before beginning clinical testing.

07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing – https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html

NOTE –  By other authorized COVID-19 diagnostic methods … they mean molecular tests, antigen tests, and serological tests. Here its important to note that a Molecular test is the same as a PCR test, and that both antigen test and PCR test produce many false positive giving a false impression of the danger and spread of covid

🔸- Serological tests are immune system tests –  detect antibodies, and they are fine, though they sadly are seldom used. These tests are the bests to actualy ascertain if the disease was rreal or it was a false positive. Usualy PCR and antigen are used, and it is these I like to talk about. Prophesor John Ioanides from standfort university has through serological results in different countries, ascertained that covid19 has a fatality rate of 0,15 percent at the level of the flu. Serological studies are the most reliable for these kind of studies. – https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/new-study-puts-covid-infection-fatality-rate-at-only-0.15-percent
🔸- Molecular tests, PCR – First molecular tests are also PCR tests, a PCR test is a molecular test, but now they are making a difference between singleplex and multiplex PCR, now the CDC recommends using multiplex PCR tests instead. It the same technology my friend.
🔸- The antigen test, is the fast test – also proven to produce many false positives, therefore they said the goldstnadard was the PCR.  I have sevaral videos showing antigen testing false positives.

The only reliable tests are serological, and they show that covid is not more dangerous than seasonal flue – the other tests create false positives.

Through exagerating the danger and spread of covid, the powerful and influential people, with the leaders of the press – destroyed our national economies, doubled world poverty, limited our rights and freedoms, imposed vaccines through not allowing basic life rights back, though limiting travel – all fopr vacines that are unnecessary, inefective and unsafe, A great scandal.

The World Economic Forum has the foot on the speeder,  to the Great Reset

KongenErNøgen, [29.07.21 06:31] https://t.me/humansfirst
💉🧲 — VACCINE INGREDIENT GRAPHENE OXIDE, AND MAGNETIC PHENOMENA — analysis shows 98% and 99% of the content of the vaccination vials corresponds to graphene oxide

Biostatistician and founder of La Quinta Columna, Ricardo Delgado Martín, send a sample of the vaccine to clinical analysis to University of Almeria, and it shows that  98% and 99% of the content of the vaccination vials corresponds to graphene oxide.

MAGNETIC PHENOMENA – All this began when we saw the phenomenon of the magnetic anomaly,  a phenomenon that for a long time was denied, but today has been already proved. There are millions of videos of people going around the world.

So, once we conducted that basic epidemiological study, we started to wonder what materials or nanomaterials can cause magnetism in the body. And not only magnetism, but that could act as energy capacitors, because I have also measured in a multimeter an important charge… This is a phenomenon of electromagnetic induction in the metal that adheres near the inoculation area.  In addition, we have found that the magnetism then moves towards the head. And this is very important.  Surely for the purpose they may seek.

MULTIMITER CONDUCTIVITY –  In addition, a potential difference is measured with a multimeter: the person becomes a superconductor.  That is, it emits and receives signals.  And when we found the materials that can cause this type of alterations in the body, we began to talk about graphene.  We suspected it was graphene oxide since it had all the characteristics that magnetized people expressed after inoculation.

Video with subs – https://rumble.com/vjd5sf-98-to-99-of-the-vial-is-graphene-oxide-the-main-component-of-the-vaccine-is.html
Translation – https://orwellianpost.com/2021/07/24/la-quinta-columna-98-to-99-of-the-vaccination-vial-is-graphene-oxide/
Webpage – Biostatistician and founder of La Quinta Columna, Ricardo Delgado Martín – Spanish  https://www.laquintacolumna.net/

More on magnetic phenomena  …
–  NURSE MAGNETIZED AFTER VACCINE – Magnets Sticking To Nurse Brittany Galvin After Taking Vaccine – https://www.bitchute.com/video/3gGxDKavruBB/
NURSE MAGNETIZED AFTER VACCINE – INTERVIEWhttps://rumble.com/vi1ggh-breaking-first-u.s.-doctor-certifies-vaccine-injury-confirms-serious-diagno.html
HIGHWIRE TALK SHOW TEST ON STREET –  DID IT STICK? YES 6 – NO 9 – Video, The “Covid Vaccine Magnet Challenge” – https://www.bitchute.com/video/FApEqfMvbOYw/
STUDY 6th June 2021 – STUDY ON THE ELECTROMAGNETISM OF VACCINATED PERSONS IN LUXEMBOURG – Synthesis and conclusion of the survey work carried out by Amar GOUDJIL – https://www.efvv.eu/news/study-on-the-electromagnetism-of-vaccinated-persons-in-luxembourg

BE YOUR OWN SCIENTIST – TEST IT YOURSELF ON THE VACCINATED
THIS MIGHT WAKE SKEPTICS  UP TO THE IDEA THAT SOMETHING REALLY STRANGE IS HAPPENING HERE
– Be your own scientist, carry a small fridge magnet in your pocket, if someone has just been vaccinated, ask if you can test it.

CDC Quietly Revokes RT-PCR Emergency Use Authorization Because They Counted Covid-19 and Influenza Together

CDC Quietly Pulls RT-PCR Emergency Use Authorization Because They Counted Covid-19 and Influenza Togethera

CDC Quietly Revokes RT-PCR Emergency Use Authorization Because They Counted Covid-19 and Influenza Together

By J.D. Rucker • Jul. 25, 2021


Here’s a punch in the gut for a nation that’s already hurting. As it turns out, the so-called “gold standard” testing referenced by so many “doctors” like Anthony Fauci, as well as government officials across the board, has had its Emergency Use Authorization revoked.

The CDC announced, albeit quietly, on Wednesday that the RT-PCR tests used to tell millions of Americans they’re infected with Covid-19 has been unable to accurately differentiate between the various coronaviruses. Of particular note is the inability of these tests to know whether someone is infected with Covid-19 or influenza.


https://twitter.com/SteveDeaceShow/status/1419271146848018434?
https://twitter.com/SteveDeaceShow/status/1419271146848018434?

To be clear, this is not a new development. These assays have been known for years to be unable to distinguish between the different types of coronaviruses, but they ran with it anyway. According to the CDC website [emphasis added]:

After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.

In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season. Laboratories and testing sites should validate and verify their selected assay within their facility before beginning clinical testing.

As bureaucrats are wont to do, they give just enough information for their target audience to take action while omitting any details that explain the root cause. In this case, there are two reasons for this move. The first is very straight-forward. They’re switching fearmongering tactics.

The RT-PCR assays could detect the presence of a coronavirus from a swab in real-time, making it a good indicator of the potential for Covid-19 infection. In a sane world that wasn’t driven by a nefarious agenda, positive results on the RT-PCR tests would have been treated as indicators that someone needed to get a real test, like an antigen test, to determine if they were infected. But this isn’t a sane world and the powers-that-be saw an opportunity to bump up numbers to drive panic. They ran with it, and revoking the EUA means they’re done with that particular type of fearmongering. The RT-PCR assays served their purpose.

The other reason for this move is very concerning. This shift and its timing both indicate the powers-that-be are anticipating a need to differentiate between the various coronaviruses. If it really is the need to differentiate Covid-19 and influenza as they’re claiming, then that jibes with the sudden push to maximize or even mandate flu vaccines within months. If that’s the scenario they have planned, expect a sudden surge in flu cases after a year where they “miraculously” disappeared thanks to RT-PCR tests claiming everything was Covid-19.

If it’s not really flu they’re trying to detect, what is it? What do they know? What do they have planned? Is there another novel coronavirus on its way? Are they expecting Covid-19 variants to mutate into variants that will require different treatments, perhaps different “vaccines”?

If we’ve learned anything in the last year-and-a-half, it’s that we cannot dismiss “conspiracy theories” without asking real questions. I was never a conspiracy theorist in the past just as I was never an anti-vaxxer, but 2020 and 2021 have made me realize things really are as bad as some have been saying. Reality may be worse than the dystopian future they’ve been warning us about for years.

The RT-PCR tests they’ve been touting for 17-months are suddenly being blacklisted by the CDC. They lied from the start and they’re switching to new lies for whatever is coming around the corner. Question everything, folks.


~~~
https://thelibertydaily.com/cdc-quietly-revokes-rt-pcr-emergency-use-authorization-because-they-counted-covid-19-and-influenza-together/?

Caught Red-Handed: CDC Changes Test Thresholds To Virtually Eliminate New COVID Cases Among Vaxx’d

Caught Red-Handed: CDC Changes Test Thresholds To Virtually Eliminate New COVID Cases Among Vaxx’d


Tyler Durden's Photo
by Tyler Durden
Sunday, May 23, 2021 – 09:45 AM

Authored by Kit Knightly via Off-Guardian.org,

New policies will artificially deflate “breakthrough infections” in the vaccinated, while the old rules continue to inflate case numbers in the unvaccinated.

The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) is altering its practices of data logging and testing for “Covid19” in order to make it seem the experimental gene-therapy “vaccines” are effective at preventing the alleged disease.

They made no secret of this, announcing the policy changes on their website in late April/early May, (though naturally without admitting the fairly obvious motivation behind the change).

The trick is in their reporting of what they call “breakthrough infections” – that is people who are fully “vaccinated” against Sars-Cov-2 infection, but get infected anyway.

Essentially, Covid19 has long been shown – to those willing to pay attention – to be an entirely created pandemic narrative built on two key factors:

  1. False-positive tests. The unreliable PCR test can be manipulated into reporting a high number of false-positives by altering the cycle threshold (CT value)
  2. Inflated Case-count. The incredibly broad definition of “Covid case”, used all over the world, lists anyone who receives a positive test as a “Covid19 case”, even if they never experienced any symptoms.

Without these two policies, there would never have been an appreciable pandemic at all, and now the CDC has enacted two policy changes which means they no longer apply to vaccinated people.

Firstly, they are lowering their CT value when testing samples from suspected “breakthrough infections”.

From the CDC’s instructions for state health authorities on handling “possible breakthrough infections” (uploaded to their website in late April):

For cases with a known RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value, submit only specimens with Ct value ≤28 to CDC for sequencing. (Sequencing is not feasible with higher Ct values.)

Throughout the pandemic, CT values in excess of 35 have been the norm, with labs around the world going into the 40s.

Essentially labs were running as many cycles as necessary to achieve a positive result, despite experts warning that this was pointless (even Fauci himself said anything over 35 cycles is meaningless).

But NOW, and only for fully vaccinated people, the CDC will only accept samples achieved from 28 cycles or fewer. That can only be a deliberate decision in order to decrease the number of “breakthrough infections” being officially recorded.

Secondly, asymptomatic or mild infections will no longer be recorded as “covid cases”.

That’s right. Even if a sample collected at the low CT value of 28 can be sequenced into the virus alleged to cause Covid19, the CDC will no longer be keeping records of breakthrough infections that don’t result in hospitalisation or death.

From their website:

As of May 1, 2021, CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported vaccine breakthrough cases to focus on identifying and investigating only hospitalized or fatal cases due to any cause. This shift will help maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance. Previous case counts, which were last updated on April 26, 2021, are available for reference only and will not be updated moving forward.

Just like that, being asymptomatic – or having only minor symptoms – will no longer count as a “Covid case” but only if you’ve been vaccinated.

The CDC has put new policies in place which effectively created a tiered system of diagnosis. Meaning, from now on, unvaccinated people will find it much easier to be diagnosed with Covid19 than vaccinated people.

Consider…

Person A has not been vaccinated. They test positive for Covid using a PCR test at 40 cycles and, despite having no symptoms, they are officially a “covid case”.

Person B has been vaccinated. They test positive at 28 cycles, and spend six weeks bedridden with a high fever. Because they never went into a hospital and didn’t die they are NOT a Covid case.

Person C, who was also vaccinated, did die. After weeks in hospital with a high fever and respiratory problems. Only their positive PCR test was 29 cycles, so they’re not officially a Covid case either.

The CDC is demonstrating the beauty of having a “disease” that can appear or disappear depending on how you measure it.

To be clear: If these new policies had been the global approach to “Covid” since December 2019, there would never have been a pandemic at all.

If you apply them only to the vaccinated, but keep the old rules for the unvaccinated, the only possible result can be that the official records show “Covid” is much more prevalent among the latter than the former.

This is a policy designed to continuously inflate one number, and systematically minimise the other.

What is that if not an obvious and deliberate act of deception?1,191,1161,364