Asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 didn’t occur at all, study of 10 million finds | LifeSite News

 A new study of 10 million people was conducted in Wuhan, China the COVID-19 epicenter.

Asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 didn’t occur at all, study of 10 million finds | LifeSite News

Only 300 asymptomatic cases in the study of nearly 10 million were discovered, and none of those tested positive for COVID-19.

Wed Dec 23, 2020 – 7:18 pm EST

Featured Image
Shutterstock

Michael Haynes By Michael Haynes
Follow


LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here. 

ANALYSIS

WUHAN, China, December 23, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – A study of almost 10 million people in Wuhan, China, found that asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 did not occur at all, thus undermining the need for lockdowns, which are built on the premise of the virus being unwittingly spread by infectious, asymptomatic people.

Published in November in the scientific journal Nature Communications, the paper was compiled by 19 scientists, mainly from the Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, but also from scientific institutions across China as well as in the U.K. and Australia. It focused on the residents of Wuhan, ground zero for COVID-19, where 9,899,828 people took part in a screening program between May 14 and June 1, which provided clear results as to the possibility of any asymptomatic transmission of the virus.

Asymptomatic transmission has been the underlying justification of lockdowns enforced all across the world. The most recent guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) still states that the virus “can be spread by people who do not have symptoms.” In fact, the CDC claimed that asymptomatic people “are estimated to account for more than 50 percent of transmissions.”

U.K. Health Secretary Matt Hancock also promoted this message, explaining that the concept of asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 led to the U.K. advocating masks and referring to the “problem of asymptomatic transmission.”

However, the new study in Nature Communications, titled “Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly 10 million residents of Wuhan, China,” debunked the concept of asymptomatic transmission.

It stated that out of the nearly 10 million people in the study, “300 asymptomatic cases” were found. Contact tracing was then carried out and of those 300, no cases of COVID-19 were detected in any of them. “A total of 1,174 close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the COVID-19.”

Both the asymptomatic patients and their contacts were placed in isolation for two weeks, and after the fortnight, the results remained the same. “None of detected positive cases or their close contacts became symptomatic or newly confirmed with COVID-19 during the isolation period.”

Further evidence showed that “virus cultures” in the positive and repositive asymptomatic cases were all negative, “indicating no ‘viable virus’ in positive cases detected in this study.”

Ages of those found to be asymptomatic ranged between 10 and 89, with the asymptomatic positive rate being “lowest in children or adolescents aged 17 and below” and highest rate found among people older than 60.

The study also made the realization that due to a weakening of the virus itself, “newly infected persons were more likely to be asymptomatic and with a lower viral load than earlier infected cases.”

These results are not without precedent. In June, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, shed doubt upon asymptomatic transmission. Speaking at a press conference, Van Kerkhove explained, “From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual.”

She then repeated the words “It’s very rare,” but despite her word choice of “rare,” Van Kerkhove could not point to a single case of asymptomatic transmission, noting that numerous reports “were not finding secondary transmission onward.”

Her comments went against the predominant narrative justifying lockdowns, and at the time the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) highlighted that “she undermined the last bit of rationale there could be for lockdowns, mandated masks, social distancing regulation, and the entire apparatus of compulsion and coercion under which we’ve lived for three months.”

Swift to act, the WHO performed a U-turn, and the next day Van Kerkhove then declared that asymptomatic transmission was a “really complex question … We don’t actually have that answer yet.”

“I think that that’s misunderstanding to state that asymptomatic transmission globally is very rare. I was referring to a small subset of studies,” she added.

However, the new Wuhan study seems to present solid, scientific evidence that asymptomatic transmission is not just rare but nonexistent. Given that it found “no evidence that the identified asymptomatic positive cases were infectious,” the study raises important questions about lockdowns.

Commenting on the study, The Conservative Tree House noted that “all of the current lockdown regulations, mask wearing requirements and social distancing rules/decrees are based on a complete fallacy of false assumptions.” The evidence presented in the study shows that “‘very rare’ actually means ‘never’ asymptomatic spread just doesn’t happen – EVER.”

Such a large scientific study of 10 million people should not be overlooked, Jeffrey Tucker argued in the AIER, as it should be “huge news,” paving the way “to open up everything immediately.” Yet media reports have been virtually nonexistent and “ignored,” a fact that Tucker explained: “The lockdown lobby ignores whatever contradicts their narrative, preferring unverified anecdotes over an actual scientific study of 10 million residents in what was the world’s first major hotspot for the disease we are trying to manage.”

The recent findings should enable society to reopen once more, according to the AIER. Without asymptomatic transmission, “the whole basis for post-curve-flattening lockdowns,” life should resume and “we could take comfort in our normal intuition that healthy people can get out and about with no risk to others.”

“We keep hearing about how we should follow the science,” Tucker added. “The claim is tired by now. We know what’s really happening.”

He closed his commentary with the question: “With solid evidence that asymptomatic spread is nonsense, we have to ask: Who is making decisions and why?”


  asymptomatic spread, cdc, centers for disease control, covid-19, maria van kerkhove, matt hancock, nature communications, world health organization, wuhan virus

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/asymptomatic-transmission-of-covid-19-didnt-occur-at-all-study-of-10-million-finds

Timeline Situation Update And A New Cobra Interview

The original post has a plethora of links so it is best to go directly to Cobra’s blog to read and access the links. I included only the images. ~PB




Tuesday, December 8, 2020

Timeline Situation Update And A New Cobra Interview

https://2012portal.blogspot.com/2020/12/timeline-situation-update-and-new-cobra.html?

Image may contain: text that says 'winter solstice (December 21) polar night 16 months of night) Arctic circle 66.5 N) 24 hours darkness Tropic Cancer (23.5* N) 13.5 hours of darkness Equator 0n 12 ours arkness Tropic of Capricorn 23.5 S) 10.5 hours of darkness polar day 6 months of day) Antarctic Circle 66.5+ S) hours of darkness'


No photo description available.


Image may contain: night, text that says 'On December 21, 2020, Jupiter and Saturn will align in the night sky to create the first "Christmas Star" in nearly 800 years.'
Image may contain: text that says 'THE AWAKENING IS GOING MAINSTREAM. THEY CAN'T STOP IT.'





Victory of the Light! Posted by Cobra at 3:47 PM
Labels: Age of Aquarius, awakening, Cobra interview, critical mass, meditation

Why Won’t Anyone Publish the Danish Mask Study? | GreenMedInfo

Why Won’t Anyone Publish the Danish Mask Study?

Posted on: Monday, November 16th 2020 at 3:45 pm
Written By: GreenMedInfo Research Group
This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2020
Visit our Re-post guidelines

A study of 6,000 Danes was set to reveal whether wearing a face mask actually reduces the risk of COVID-19. The only problem is leading medical journals are refusing to publish the data, and the study’s lead author hinted it’s because they’re not “brave enough” to do it

Does a mask work? It’s a question recently posed by the Danish newspaper Berlingske,[i] and one that would seem to demand an answer from scientists and public health officials alike. Yet, despite mask mandates existing in 34 U.S. states and the District of Columbia,[ii] there’s shockingly little hard data about whether or not they slow the spread of infectious disease.

Researchers from Denmark wanted to change that, conducting what may be the only randomized trial[iii] to determine if masks actually protect against COVID-19,[iv]but multiple medical journals have refused to publish the findings.

Thomas Benfield, a researcher at the University of Copenhagen and one of the study’s lead authors,[v] was asked when it would be published. Former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson published Benfield’s emailed response on Twitter, which is simply: “As soon as a journal is brave enough …”[vi]

What Does the Danish Mask Study Reveal?

Speaking to Nature in October 2020, Benfield said his team wasn’t yet ready to share the study’s results.[vii] In truth, three medical journals — The Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association — have refused to publish the study, leading to speculation that it reveals a message that goes against the status quo.

Berlingske, which is the oldest daily newspaper in Denmark, suggests this is so, stating (loosely translated), “The researchers behind a large and unique Danish study on the effect of wearing a mask even have great difficulty in getting their research results published. One of the participating professors in the study admits that the still secret research result can be perceived as ‘controversial.'”[viii],[ix]

The study included 6,000 participants who were randomly assigned to wear a face mask or not for a 30-day period. Participants were confirmed to not have COVID-19 or symptoms of it at the start of the study, and they were required to spend more than three hours per day outside of the home with exposure to other people during the study period.[x]

Described as an “outstanding sample,” the Berlingske article, which was written by Lars Henrik Aagaard, praised the study, noting, “The study and its size are unique in the world, and the purpose was once and for all to try to clarify the extent to which the use of masks in public space provides protection against corona infection.”[xi]

While the results were originally expected to be published in August 2020, Benfield later said that his comment was taken “a bit out of context” and, “The article is being reviewed by a respected journal. We have decided not to publish data until the article has been accepted.”[xii]

Study Co-Author Hints at Controversial Results

Aagaard interviewed another of the study’s researchers, Christian Torp-Pedersen, a chief physician at North Zealand Hospital’s research department, who similarly said, “We cannot start discussing what they (the medical journals) are dissatisfied with because, in that case, we must also explain what the study showed, and we do not want to discuss that until it is published.”[xiii]

He then went on to say that he “might also have dared to go as far as Benfield,” had he been asked why the results haven’t been published, referring to his “brave enough” comment. Aagaard asks, “Does this mean that your research results may be perceived as controversial in the eyes of some?” to which Torp-Pedersen replies, “That’s how I want to interpret it, too.”

Aagaard then states, “Can one interpret a controversial research result in the sense that no significant effect of mask use is demonstrated in your study?” Torp-Pedersen says, “I think that’s a very relevant question you are asking.”[xiv]

Dr. Henning Bundgaard with Denmark’s Rigshospitalet is another of the study’s authors. In speaking with Bloomberg in July 2020 — when he still expected the study’s results to become public the next month — he said, “All these countries recommending face masks haven’t made their decisions based on new studies.”[xv]

Denmark was one of the latest countries to institute a mask mandate, which took effect October 29, 2020 for all public indoor spaces.[xvi]
In July, however, Bundgaard told Bloomberg he worried mask mandates may offer a “false sense of security” and make people “sloppy” when following other guidelines like handwashing, self-isolating if you’re sick and social distancing. Also revealing is Bloomberg’s last paragraph:

Bundgaard’s study on masks is due to be published next month. In the meantime, he says he hopes they don’t become mandatory in Denmark.”[xvii]

Masks have become a contentious topic in the U.S., dividing neighbors, colleagues and families over whether or not they slow the spread of infectious disease. The controversy continues to grow, particularly since public health officials have been giving conflicting information from the start,[xviii] and solid data, such as what may be revealed via the Danish study, is sorely lacking.


References

[i] Washington Examiner October 22, 2020 https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/top-scientific-journals-reject-controversial-danish-study-on-effectiveness-of-face-masks-against-coronavirus-report

[ii] Axios August 4, 2020 https://www.axios.com/states-face-coverings-mandatory-a0e2fe35-5b7b-458e-9d28-3f6cdb1032fb.html

[iii] Twitter October 18, 2020 https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1317875526997102594

[iv] ClinicalTrials.gov, Reduction in COVID-19 Infection Using Surgical Facial Masks Outside the Healthcare System https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04337541

[v] Nature October 6, 2020 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8

[vi] Twitter October 18, 2020 https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1317875526997102594

[vii] Nature October 6, 2020 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8

[viii] The Blaze October 22, 2020 https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-danish-newspaper-reveals-largest-study-masks-rejected

[ix] Berlingske October 19, 2020 https://www.berlingske.dk/videnskab/professor-stort-dansk-maskestudie-afvist-af-tre-top-tidsskrifter

[x] Washington Examiner October 22, 2020 https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/top-scientific-journals-reject-controversial-danish-study-on-effectiveness-of-face-masks-against-coronavirus-report

[xi] The Blaze October 22, 2020 https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-danish-newspaper-reveals-largest-study-masks-rejected

[xii] Washington Examiner October 22, 2020 https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/top-scientific-journals-reject-controversial-danish-study-on-effectiveness-of-face-masks-against-coronavirus-report

[xiii] The Blaze October 22, 2020 https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-danish-newspaper-reveals-largest-study-masks-rejected

[xiv] The Blaze October 22, 2020 https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-danish-newspaper-reveals-largest-study-masks-rejected

[xv] Bloomberg July 26, 2020 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-26/face-mask-photo-op-adds-to-bewilderment-over-non-use-in-denmark

[xvi] The Local October 29, 2020 https://www.thelocal.dk/20201029/denmarks-extended-face-mask-requirement-takes-effect-these-are-the-rules-you-need-to-know

[xvii] Bloomberg July 26, 2020 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-26/face-mask-photo-op-adds-to-bewilderment-over-non-use-in-denmark

[xviii] Twitter February 29, 2020 https://twitter.com/Surgeon_General/status/1233725785283932160

GMI Research Group

The GMI Research Group (GMIRG) is dedicated to investigating the most important health and environmental issues of the day.  Special emphasis will be placed on environmental health.  Our focused and deep research will explore the many ways in which the present condition of the human body directly reflects the true state of the ambient environment.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.

© [November 16th 2020] GreenMedInfo LLC. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of GreenMedInfo LLC. Want to learn more from GreenMedInfo? Sign up for the newsletter here //www.greenmedinfo.com/greenmed/newsletter.

https//www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/why-won-t-anyone-publish-danish-mask-study?

Important Updates from FM144 (Starseed Support Channel for Terra Groundcrew)

TAGS: Berlin, Black Magic, Cabal, Colour Revolution, COVID-19, DEWs, Dracos, Energetic Attacks, False Flags, Fires, FM144, Grid, Important Updates, Jr., Ley Lines, Light Columns, Lockdowns, Mars Influence, Masks Social Distancing, Mass Awakening, Mass Meditation, Philanthropists, Pleiadians, Prepare, Robert F. Kennedy, Scalar Weapons, Starseed Support, Technological Dystopia, Terra Groundcrew, Vaccines,

FM 144

Starseed Support Channel for Terra Groundcrew


Autumn Forecast (19.09.2020)

.
As expected, the Cabal pushes a second lockdown just in time for the beginning of autumn to finally give the economy the final blow by boosting testing and thus the number of COVID-19 cases.
.
Israel makes the start, where people are currently not allowed to move more than 500 meters away from their homes:
.
https://www.rt.com/news/500576-netanyahu-coronavirus-lockdown-protests/
.
But there were already first signs in Europe when Hungary closed its borders to its neighbouring countries at the beginning of September, including Austria, where the Cabal implemented a so called “traffic light” system (very similar to the Chinese colour codes) to shut down individual cities and districts as needed:
.
http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-09/04/c_139342963.htm
.
While on the southern hemisphere cities like Melbourne currently serve as a test chamber to see how far totalitarian measures can be applied against a Western-oriented society (with the objective of applying this to Europe or North America too at some point):
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i1q00BRIw4
.
Soon, also people who “might” violate the lockdown could be arrested:
.
https://www.rt.com/news/501063-victoria-debates-precrime-police-covid/
.
To counteract this, a worldwide mass meditation has already been called for, which will take place on September 21st and in which every Lightworker is invited to participate (bear in mind energetic protection):
.
https://www.welovemassmeditation.com/2020/09/meditation-against-engineered-second-wave-lockdowns-on-september-21st-at-1008-pm-utc.html
.

.
No matter what the outcome, the Cabal will probably not be able to force all countries into a lockdown (or they will not name it as such), as the resistance in the population is growing stronger and stronger, as the demonstrations in London and Berlin showed:
.
https://www.rt.com/uk/499430-unite-for-freedom-london-coronavirus/
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHBzjfS3PdU
.
Meanwhile also dear Mr. Gates becomes an opponent of vaccination when it comes to the fact that it may not be “his” vaccine which is made available to the public:
.
https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/bill-gates-wonders-whether-fda-can-be-trusted-on-a-covid-vaccine
.
And the US Secretary of Justice has just stated on public television that the lockdown may have been unconstitutional:
.
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/09/16/politics/barr-justice-department-speech/index.html
.

.
As the election approaches, the USA is busy with other things anyway: On one hand, the attempt of a colour revolution by Cabal-controlled extremist groups and on the other hand the wild fires along the West Coast, which are partly man-made on site but also partly caused by the use of DEWs:
.
https://stillnessinthestorm.com/2020/09/are-directed-energy-weapons-starting-fires-in-california-and-oregon/
.
https://www.military.com/video/air-force-harnessing-power-directed-energy
.
The whole situation in the US creates more and more surreal sceneries that truly resemble an end-time mood:
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ne88OiChefw
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wQb4SfPO4E
.
It shouldn’t remain unmentioned that Gates’ father passed away this week:
.
https://globalnews.ca/news/7337969/bill-gates-father-dead/
.
As well as US Supreme Court judge Ginsburg:
.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/18/us/ruth-bader-ginsburg-dead.html
.
While other Cabal controlled philanthropists and architects of colour revolutions are increasingly becoming the focus of public attention:
.
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/516961-fox-news-anchor-addresses-cutting-off-gingrich-linking-soros-to-violent
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUxilJznKyY
.
Besides all state tyranny, if the Cabal should also come up now with the idea of using the military against the surface population, this should no longer be possible, since large parts of the military worldwide are already under positive control and are actually waiting to strike against Cabal controlled governments.
.

.
This could/should have happened already in March during the first lockdown, but a too big part of the population would probably not have been accepted this scenario. Now, however, as people are becoming more and more aware of the economic effects of the lockdowns, while the lies and totalitarian measures of certain governments are becoming more and more obvious too, the positive military could be in a far better position to take over.
.
However, it is impossible to say whether this will happen or not (or when). Fact is, we will probably experience another (False Flag) event this fall, that might not have anything to do with the virus anymore, but it will probably create even more chaos in the short term, but in the long run it will have a positive effect.
.
It is still recommended to stock up on food as we enter this challenging autumn.
.
It is also important to remember that the Lightships of the Galactic Confederation are stationed across our skies and are heavily involved in ground operations.
.

.

.
Of course, the ships of the Dark Ones are also active, among them are not only the ships of the Dracos, but also those that may appear Pleiadic, but belong to the opposite side. These are groups of renegade Pleiadians, which are contaminated by negative technology and Anomaly … but this is only a small group.
.
What some of them try to do is steal/abduct energetic Soul Parts of the Starseeds incarnated on the surface. If necessary, these parts must be retrieved in a meditation, if one has the feeling of being affected.
.
When negative ships are active, Starseeds usually gets irradiated by scalar weapons and begin to feel bad, while when the Light Force is active above you, you feel light, free and extraordinarily positive.
.
In response to the question in relation to Germany (but this also applies worldwide) about what could be done to free important energy points on the Earth’s surface to bring the Grid down, I cannot reveal the exact locations at the moment, but what I can say is that in order to free these points, energetic actions alone are not enough, because in almost all cases these points are deliberately blocked by the Dark Ones through (big) negative physical objects.
.
And these objects need to be physically removed completely in order to allow a, for example, vortex or a Ley Line to flow freely again. Such physical removals will probably only be possible after the Event.
.

.
Nevertheless, energetic operations can be performed to decrease the negative effects of these physical objects. Therefore the note: keep an eye out for Churches, and especially Cathedrals, and envelop them in Light Columns. And if you live near one, you can bury a Cintamani Stone near it. But don’t forget to energetically separate yourself from the stone after the placement.
.
That’s all for now. To finish off, here is a beautiful video of the many Lights right at the Siegessäule in Berlin three weeks ago:
.
https://youtu.be/EMWcxfqMeQs?t=116
.

.

Kommentare (be sure to read comments at source link)

<a href=”http://&lt;!– wp:paragraph –> <p><a href=”https://www.blogger.com/#”>https://fm144.blogspot.com/2020/09/autumn-forecast-19092020.html<br><br&gt;.</a><br>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br><br><a href=”https://fm144.blogspot.com/2020/08/weeks-of-awakening.html”><time datetime=”2020-08-27T16:27:00-07:00″>August 27, 2020</time></a></p> https://fm144.blogspot.com/2020/09/autumn-forecast-19092020.html

.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Weeks of Awakening

.
The Mars energies of the past days are currently generating a lot of potential for aggression within the surface population. Combined with Black Magic and neg. irradiation executed by the Cabal, this can currently also cause a lot of chaos in the world.
.
And of course also energetic attacks, which are supposed to trigger physical arguments, violence, injuries, problems with technical devices as well as nightmares, as the Archons manipulate mind and non-physical body.
.

Here protection, cleaning, implant removal, healing, charging is important … I have already made several entries on this blog concerning these topics:
.
https://fm144.blogspot.com/2019/04/major-planetary-update-part-ii-return.html
.
https://fm144.blogspot.com/2019/08/hot-august-protection-protocol-for-mass.html
.
On a global scale these attacks manifests itself in tensions between individual countries, but also through many protests within countries, see Belarus:
.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/aug/27/belarus-protests-putin-ready-to-send-lukashenko-military-support
.
See USA:
.
https://www.rt.com/usa/499270-white-house-protest-rnc/
.
While some of the protests are engineered by the Cabal, there is also resistance which actually comes from an awakened population, see Germany, where after the Anti-Corona protests about a month ago a new even bigger protest is planned for this weekend.
.
.

.
.

Germany is an extremely important energetic hub on the planet, which the Cabal has always tried to suppress and manipulate (culminating with the staging of the two World Wars in the last century).
.
It has also one with the highest number of incarnated Lightworkers in order to keep the vibration high.
.

In the last two years there have been several operations of the Light Forces in this country and several Key Lightworkers have been stationed at various energetically important points … Key Lightworkers, whose sheer presence cleanses these points and also raises the consciousness of the population:
.
https://fm144.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-wingmakers.html
.
We may be seeing the physical effects right now, because while at the last protest in Berlin there were already (contrary to the mainstream media reports) several hundred thousand people on the streets, this event now has the potential to gather a couple of millions which would not only be the biggest peace event in the history of Germany, but also one within world history.
.
It was also confirmed that Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. will be in Berlin this weekend.
.

.

The city government has already banned the protest, and definitely will put further obstacles in the way (meanwhile, by building up the narrative that the protesters would arm themselves). The organizers are doing everything in their power to make the event happen, and many people, also from across Europe, will come despite the ban:
.
https://www.rt.com/news/499132-germany-berlin-coronavirus-protest/
.
In order to prevent the police or provocateurs or hijackers from turning peaceful protest into polarization and violence, a protective meditation has already been called for:
.
https://www.welovemassmeditation.com/2020/08/peace-meditation-for-berlin-on-august-29th.html
.
For Starseeds who live near Berlin and who don’t know if they should join the protest, I repeat my answer to one of the comments in the last article:
.
“Whether you take part in this is up to your own inner guidance. Some Souls are certainly currently here to stand on the street. Some highly empathic Starseeds are not advised to participate, however, as the energies out there can be simply too chaotic and they can become the target of archon or reptile triggered attacks (as these beings could attach themselves to policemen or provocateurs and thus could create physical violence).
.
It is not for nothing that their own home currently serves as a safe house for many Starseeds and many Key Lightworkers can help much more when they perform energetic operations in a safe space instead of standing on the street. Also, many Starseeds who suffer from severe energetic attacks currently do not have the strength to leave their home.”

.
The Light Forces also clearly advise that especially “Old Souls” should rather stay at home and clean/protect the movements from there.
.

.

These meditations should of course continue to be extended to countries such as Belarus, the USA, China, the Near and Middle East, the whole world in order to harmonize this critical phase.
.
A part of the Cabal wants to go through with the second lockdown, see Paris, where since today one has to wear a mask everywhere:
.
https://www.france24.com/en/20200827-pm-castex-says-france-needs-to-envisage-all-scenarios-on-how-to-contain-covid-19-including-lockdowns
.
The mask insanity and the social distancing is only the preparation for the technological dystopia that is planned for humanity after the pandemic:
.
www.engadget.com/working-neuralink-device-on-august-28th-at-3-pm-et-081007843.html
.
But on the other hand, the narrative is staggering massively at the moment, so that the chances are increasing that there will soon be a big false flag again as a further distraction.
.
Therefore it is important to stay calm but on guard, so we can manifest a peaceful awakening of the population.
.

.
Let’s finish this entry with this matching remix of a song already posted here:
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDm73QxrzS0

.
Kommentare (be sure to read comments at source link)

https://fm144.blogspot.com/2020/08/weeks-of-awakening.html

Whitney: Looks Like Sweden Was Right After All | ZeroHedge

I realize this is a controversial topic, but we tend to only hear one perspective in the MSM, so I think its good to consider other viewpoints and approaches to sociopolitical issues. ~PB


Authored by Mike Whitney via The Unz Review,

Why is the media so fixated on Sweden’s coronavirus policy? What difference does it make?

Sweden settled on a policy that they thought was both sustainable and would save as many lives as possible. They weren’t trying to ‘show anyone up’ or ‘prove how smart they were’. They simply took a more traditionalist approach that avoided a full-scale lockdown. That’s all.

But that’s the problem, isn’t it? And that’s why Sweden has been so harshly criticized in the media, because they refused to do what everyone else was doing. They refused to adopt a policy that elites now universally support, a policy that scares people into cowering submission. The Swedish model is a threat to that approach because it allows people to maintain their personal freedom even in the midst of a global pandemic. Ruling class elites don’t want that, that is not in their interests. What they want is for the people to meekly accept the rules and conditions that lead to their eventual enslavement. That’s the real objective, complete social control, saving lives has nothing to do with it. Sweden opposed that approach which is why Sweden has to be destroyed. It’s that simple.

Of course, none of this has anything to do with Sweden’s fatality rate, which is higher than some and lower than others. (Sweden has 543 deaths per million, which means roughly 1 death in every 2,000 people.) But like every other country, the vast majority of Swedish fatalities are among people 70 years and older with underlying health conditions. (“90% of the country’s deaths have been among those over 70.”) Sweden was not successful in protecting the people in its elderly care facilities, so large numbers of them were wiped out following the outbreak. Sweden failed in that regard and they’ve admitted they failed. Even so, the failures of implementation do not imply that the policy is wrong. Quite the contrary. Sweden settled on a sustainable policy, that keeps the economy running, preserves an atmosphere of normality, and exposes its young, low-risk people to the infection, thus, moving the population closer to the ultimate goal of “herd immunity”.

[ZH: in Sweden (pop. 10.25m) – where there was no lockdown, huge international criticism of its strategy, and one of the highest fatalities per head in the world – only 70 people under 49 years old have died of Covid-19, out of 5,482 total virus deaths (1.3%) so far. For context, average annual deaths in Sweden over the last 5 years for under-49-year-olds have been 3,417.  ]

Presently, Sweden is very close to reaching herd immunity which is a condition in which the majority have developed antibodies that will help to fend-off similar sars-covid infections in the future. Absent a vaccine, herd immunity is the best that can be hoped for. It ensures that future outbreaks will be less disruptive and less lethal. Take a look at this excerpt from an article at the Off-Guardian which helps to explain what’s really going on:

“Sweden’s health minister understood that the only chance to beat COVID-19 was to get the Swedish population to a Herd Immunity Threshold against COVID-19, and that’s exactly what they have done…

The Herd Immunity Threshold (“HIT”) for COVID-19 is between 10-20%

This fact gets less press than any other. Most people understand the basic concept of herd immunity and the math behind it. In the early days, some public health officials speculated that COVID-19’s HIT was 70%. Obviously, the difference between a HIT of 70% and a HIT of 10-20% is dramatic, and the lower the HIT, the quicker a virus will burn out as it loses the ability to infect more people, which is exactly what COVID-19 is doing everywhere, including the U.S, which is why the death curve above looks the way it looks.

Scientists from Oxford, Virginia Tech, and the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, all recently explained the HIT of COVID-19 in this paper:

We searched the literature for estimates of individual variation in propensity to acquire or transmit COVID-19 or other infectious diseases and overlaid the findings as vertical lines in Figure 3. Most CV estimates are comprised between 2 and 4, a range where naturally acquired immunity to SARS-CoV-2 may place populations over the herd immunity threshold once as few as 10-20% of its individuals are immune….

Naturally acquired herd immunity to COVID-19 combined with earnest protection of the vulnerable elderly – especially nursing home and assisted living facility residents — is an eminently reasonable and practical alternative to the dubious panacea of mass compulsory vaccination against the virus.

This strategy was successfully implemented in Malmo, Sweden, which had few COVID-19 deaths by assiduously protecting its elder care homes, while “schools remained open, residents carried on drinking in bars and cafes, and the doors of hairdressers and gyms were open throughout.

One of the most vocal members of the scientific community discussing COVID-19’s HIT is Stanford’s Nobel-laureate Dr. Michael Levitt. Back on May 4, he gave this great interview to the Stanford Daily where he advocated for Sweden’s approach of letting COVID-19 spread naturally through the community until you arrive at HIT. He stated:

“If Sweden stops at about 5,000 or 6,000 deaths, we will know that they’ve reached herd immunity, and we didn’t need to do any kind of lockdown. My own feeling is that it will probably stop because of herd immunity. COVID is serious, it’s at least a serious flu. But it’s not going to destroy humanity as people thought.”

Guess what? That’s exactly what happened. As of today, 7 weeks after his prediction, Sweden has 5,550 deaths. In this graph, you can see that deaths in Sweden PEAKED when the HIT was halfway to its peak (roughly 7.3%) and by the time the virus hit 14% it was nearly extinguished.”

(“Second wave? Not even close“, JB Handley, The Off-Guardian)

In other words, Sweden is rapidly approaching the endgame which means that restrictions can be dropped entirely and normal life can resume. They will have maintained their dignity and freedom while the rest of the world hid under their beds for months on end. They won’t have to reopen their primary schools because they never shut them down to begin with. Numerous reports indicate that young children are neither at risk nor do they pass the virus to others. Most Americans don’t know this because the propaganda media has omitted the news from their coverage. Here’s a clip from the National Review which helps to explain:

Kari Stefansson, CEO of the Icelandic company deCODE genetics in Reykjavík, studied the spread of COVID-19 in Iceland with Iceland’s Directorate of Health and the National University Hospital. His project has tested 36,500 people; as of this writing,

Children under 10 are less likely to get infected than adults and if they get infected, they are less likely to get seriously ill. What is interesting is that even if children do get infected, they are less likely to transmit the disease to others than adults. We have not found a single instance of a child infecting parents.”

(“Icelandic Study: ‘We Have Not Found a Single Instance of a Child Infecting Parents.’“, National Review)

This is just one of many similar reports from around the world. Most of the schools in Europe have already reopened and lifted restrictions on distancing and masks. Meanwhile, in the US, the reopening of schools has become another contentious political issue pitting Trump against his Democrat adversaries who are willing to sacrifice the lives of schoolchildren to prevent the president from being reelected. It’s a cynical-counterproductive approach that reveals the vindictiveness of the people who support it. In an election year, everything is politics. (Watch Tucker Carlson’s short segment on “Kids cannot afford to stay locked down.)

Here’s a question for you: Have you ever wondered why the virus sweeps through the population and then seemingly dissipates and dies out? In fact, the virus doesn’t simply die-out, it runs out of people to infect. But how can that be when only 1 of 7 people will ever contract the virus?

The answer is immunity, either natural immunity or built up immunity from other Sars-Covid exposure. Here’s more from the Off Guardian piece:

“Scientists are now showing evidence that up to 81% of us can mount a strong response to COVID-19 without ever having been exposed to it before:

Cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 T-cell epitopes revealed preexisting T-cell responses in 81% of unexposed individuals, and validation of similarity to common cold human coronaviruses provided a functional basis for postulated heterologous immunity.

This alone could explain WHY the Herd Immunity Threshold (HIT) is so much lower for COVID-19 than some scientists thought originally, when the number being talked about was closer to 70%. Many of us have always been immune!

(“Second wave? Not even close”, JB Handley, The Off-Guardian)

What does it mean?

It means that Fauci and the idiots in the media have been lying to us the whole time. It means that Covid-19 is not a totally new virus for which humans have no natural immunity or built-in protection. Covid is a derivative of other infections which is why the death toll isn’t alot higher. Check this out from the BBC:

“People testing negative for coronavirus antibodies may still have some immunity, a study has suggested. For every person testing positive for antibodies, two were found to have specific T-cells which identify and destroy infected cells. This was seen even in people who had mild or symptomless cases of Covid-19..

This could mean a wider group have some level of immunity to Covid-19 than antibody testing figures, like those published as part of the UK Office for National Statistics Infection Survey, suggest…..And these people should be protected if they are exposed to the virus for a second time.”

(“Coronavirus: Immunity may be more widespread than tests suggest“, BBC)

Now, I realize that there’s some dispute about immunity, but there shouldn’t be. If you contract the virus, you either won’t get it again or you’ll get a much milder case. And if immunity doesn’t exist, then we’re crazy to waste our time trying to develop a vaccine, right?

What the science tells us is that immunity does exist and the reason the vast majority of people didn’t get the infection— is not because they locked themselves indoors and hid behind the sofa– but because they already have partial immunity either from their genetic makeup or from previous exposure to Sars-CoV-2 which was identified in 2002.

It’s worth repeating that the reason everyone was so scared about Covid originally was because it was hyped as a “novel virus”, completely new with no known cure or natural protection. That was a lie that was propagated by Fauci and his dissembling Vaccine Mafia, all of who are responsible for the vast destruction to the US economy, the unprecedented spike in unemployment, and the obliteration of tens of thousands of small businesses.

As the author points out, we should have known from the incident on the Diamond Princess (Cruise Liner) that immunity was far more widespread than previously thought. Readers might recall that only 17% of the people on board tested Covid-positive, “despite an ideal environment for mass spread, implying 83% of the people were somehow protected from the new virus.”

Think about that for a minute. All of the passengers were 60 years old or older, but only 17% caught the virus. Why?

Immunity, that’s why. What else could it be? Cross immunity, natural immunity, or SARS-CoV-2 T-cell immunity. Whatever you want to call it, it exists and it explains why the vast majority of people will not get the highly-contagious Covid no matter what they do.

It’s also worth pointing out that even according to the CDC’s own statistics, the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) is a mere 0.26% whereas “According to the latest immunological and serological studies, the overall lethality of Covid-19 (IFR) is about 0.1% and thus in the range of a strong seasonal influenza (flu).” (“Facts about Covid-19”, Swiss Policy Research)

So the death rate is somewhere in the neighborhood of 1 in every 500 (who contract the virus) to 1 in every 1,000. How can any rational person shut down a $21 trillion economy and order 340 million people into quarantine, based on the fact that 1 in every thousand people (mostly old and infirm) might die from an infection?? That was a act of pure, unalloyed Madness for which the American people will pay dearly for years to come. Once again, the US response was crafted by people who were promoting their own narrow political, social and economic agenda, not acting in the interests of the American people. We should expect more from our leaders than this.

So what does all of this say about the sharp spike in Covid positive cases in the south and the chances of a “second wave”?

There’s not going to be a second wave (The massive BLM protests in NY city has not produced any uptick in deaths, because NY has already achieved herd immunity. In contrast, Florida will undoubtedly experience more fatalities because it has not yet reached HIT or the Herd Immunity Threshold. Cases are increasing because younger- low-risk people are circulating more freely and because testing has increased by many orders of magnitude. At the same time, deaths continue to go down.

On Wednesday, US new cases rose to an eye-watering 62,000 in one day while deaths are down 75% from the April peak. This shouldn’t come as a surprise because the pattern has been the same as in countries around the world. The trajectory of infections was mapped out long ago by UK epidemiologist and statistician, William Farr. Take a look:

“Farr shows us that once peak infection has been reached then it will roughly follow the same symmetrical pattern on the downward slope. However, under testing and variations in testing regimes means we have no way of knowing when the peak of infections occurred. In this situation, we should use the data on deaths to predict the peak. There is a predicted time lag from infection to COVID deaths of approximately 21 to 28 days.

Once peak deaths have been reached we should be working on the assumption that the infection has already started falling in the same progressive steps. …

Farr, also illustrated that those who are the most ‘mortal die out’, and in a pandemic are those in most need of shielding….(So, Farr saw the wisdom of the Swedish approach a full 180 years ago!)

In the midst of a pandemic, it is easy to forget Farr’s Law, and think the number infected will just keep rising, it will not. Just as quick as measures were introduced to prevent the spread of infection we need to recognize the point at which to open up society and also the special measures due to ‘density’ that require special considerations. But most of all we must remember the message Farr left us: what goes up must come down.”

(“COVID-19: William Farr’s way out of the Pandemic”, The Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine)

What this tells us is that the fatality rate is a more reliable barometer of what is taking place than the spike in new cases. And what the death rates signals is that the virus is on its last legs. We are not seeing the onset of a second wave, but the gradual ending of the first. Also, the fact that tens of thousands of young people are contracting Covid-19 without experiencing any pain or discomfort, confirms that immunity is widespread. This is a very positive development.

Here’s how Dr. John Thomas Littell, MD, who is President of the County Medical Society, and Chief of Staff at the Florida Hospital, summed it up in a letter to the editor of the Orlando Medical News, He said:

“Why did we as a society stop sending our children to schools and camps and sports activities? Why did we stop going to work and church and public parks and beaches? Why did we insist that healthy persons “stay at home” – rather than observing the evidence-based, medically prudent method of identifying those who were sick and isolating them from the rest of the population – advising the sick to “stay at home” and allowing the rest of society to function normally.”

(“Second wave? Not even close”, JB Handley, The Off-Guardian)

Why? Because we were misled by Doctor Fauci and the Vaccine Gestapo, that’s why. In contrast, Sweden shrugged off the dire predictions and fearmongering, and “got it right the first time.”

Hurrah for Sweden! 🇸🇪

Of Masks and Men: fb Shaming, Shadow-Banning, + P.C. Peer Pressure.

NOTE: The first part is taken from my FB post that was grey-shadowed and labeled “False Information”. It is followed by a video exploring the controversy, and an article by a doctor who has serious concern for the health of mask-wearers. ~PB

In my opinion, this is NOT “false Information”, it is a learned opinion of a Doctor who researched the topic as well as studied COVID-19 cases. He happens to disagree with the CDC on the proper approach to this virus, in the interests of preserving the health of the general public and life itself for COVID patients. Dr. Baylor’s OPINION is no less valid than other doctors, and many other doctors echo his legitimate concerns. fb has a new panel of “experts” that deems itself the sole arbiter of “correct” and “truthful” information, instead of letting us share, discuss, learn, consider evidence and expert opinions, then decide for ourselves. this is in violation of free speech. No one is screaming “fire” in a crowded theater.

 
By their increasing intolerance, fb is thus engaging in a public “shaming” to make people shun those who disagree with the official narrative. That doesn’t save lives, it makes the world intolerant and divides communities. Fascism at its finest. As stated in the comments below, I understand the serious danger to vulnerable populations, and I comply with the mask-wearing protocol when I leave the house (I live alone), because I want others to feel safe, and especially because of the density of population in this city, Also, because I want to foster an attitude of cooperation and trust, but this does not mean I advocate for blind trust or that we need to accept being treated like ignorant children.

from a fb discussion thread (only my comments are taken from the discussion):

  • Me: I wear the mask if anyone is within 15′ of me, but take it off to breathe normally, re-oxygenate and calm my shallow breathing/hyperventilation. Masks are not healthy for the one wearing them, especially during exercise. That’s nothing new. Wearing them despite the dangers to personal health is new. They say if you wear a mask and you are sick, it can force the virus into the olfactory nerves and into the brain rather than just the respiratory system. It is definitely more challenging for people living in a city, which is why I think we have to comply with mask wearing, like it or not, due to the density of population. But if I have a mask on and I’m less than 6′ from someone, whether they have one on or not, I’m not going to freak out about it.

  • Me: While I understand the valid points made in this article, I still think it is different living in a city..we have to err on the side of caution due to the density of population.

  • Me: (after fb greyed out my article and labeled it as “False Information”)
    Apparently we are not allowed to even have a discussion. My personal experience is that I have trouble breathing with a mask on for extended period (like over 10 or 15 minutes, especially when moving/walking, etc. I have a thyroid issue (overactive) and that may be a factor. Now they will tell me I am wrong and have no trouble breathing. This militaristic approach where only the CDC and WHO, both known to be corrupt, have sole authority to dictate truth, while actual doctors expressing opinions based on their own experience and observations are invalidated. Fascism dictates; Democracy engages various perspectives; a Constitutional Republic will go after these Fascists on behalf of We the People.


Opinions vary, yet those with different opinions have their videos deleted and face potential de-platforming.Are we in Communist China? Natzi Germany?  I think this is still the United States of America…or at least, some of us are fighting to preserve this great nation, and our way of life!  ~PB

SHOULD YOU REALLY WEAR A MASK?

May 15, 2020


151K subscribers
https://youtu.be/czjAebDKsEw

SHOULD YOU REALLY WEAR A MASK? After A-lister, Matthew McConaughey, toured the media circuit with his “mandatory masks” message, many still question if wearing a mask helps stop Coronavirus. Top Microbiologist and Immunologist from Ireland, Dolores Cahill, PhD weighs in with some VERY definitive answers.

#MaskShaming #Covid19 #Coronavirus #Masks #MaskFacts

blank
Image credit: engin akyurt on Unsplash

Blaylock: Face Masks Pose Serious Risks To The Healthy

image_pdfimage_print
Dr. Russell Blaylock warns that not only do face masks fail to protect the healthy from getting sick, but they also create serious health risks to the wearer. The bottom line is that if you are not sick, you should not wear a face mask.As businesses reopen, many are requiring shoppers and employees to wear a face mask. Costco, for instance, will not allow shoppers into the store without wearing a face mask. Many employers are requiring all employees to wear a face mask while at work. In some jurisdictions, all citizens must wear a face mask if they are outside of their own home.  ⁃ TN Editor

With the advent of the so-called COVID-19 pandemic, we have seen a number of medical practices that have little or no scientific support as regards reducing the spread of this infection. One of these measures is the wearing of facial masks, either a surgical-type mask, bandana or N95 respirator mask. When this pandemic began and we knew little about the virus itself or its epidemiologic behavior, it was assumed that it would behave, in terms of spread among communities, like other respiratory viruses. Little has presented itself after intense study of this virus and its behavior to change this perception.

This is somewhat of an unusual virus in that for the vast majority of people infected by the virus, one experiences either no illness (asymptomatic) or very little sickness. Only a very small number of people are at risk of a potentially serious outcome from the infection—mainly those with underlying serious medical conditions in conjunction with advanced age and frailty, those with immune compromising conditions and nursing home patients near the end of their lives. There is growing evidence that the treatment protocol issued to treating doctors by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), mainly intubation and use of a ventilator (respirator), may have contributed significantly to the high death rate in these select individuals.

By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.

Russell Blaylock, MD

As for the scientific support for the use of face mask, a recent careful examination of the literature, in which 17 of the best studies were analyzed, concluded that, “ None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.”1   Keep in mind, no studies have been done to demonstrate that either a cloth mask or the N95 mask has any effect on transmission of the COVID-19 virus. Any recommendations, therefore, have to be based on studies of influenza virus transmission. And, as you have seen, there is no conclusive evidence of their efficiency in controlling flu virus transmission.

It is also instructive to know that until recently, the CDC did not recommend wearing a face mask or covering of any kind, unless a person was known to be infected, that is, until recently. Non-infected people need not wear a mask. When a person has TB we have them wear a mask, not the entire community of non-infected. The recommendations by the CDC and the WHO are not based on any studies of this virus and have never been used to contain any other virus pandemic or epidemic in history.

Now that we have established that there is no scientific evidence necessitating the wearing of a face mask for prevention, are there dangers to wearing a face mask, especially for long periods? Several studies have indeed found significant problems with wearing such a mask. This can vary from headaches, to increased airway resistance, carbon dioxide accumulation, to hypoxia, all the way to serious life-threatening complications.

There is a difference between the N95 respirator mask and the surgical mask (cloth or paper mask) in terms of side effects. The N95 mask, which filters out 95% of particles with a median diameter >0.3 µm2 , because it impairs respiratory exchange (breathing) to a greater degree than a soft mask, and is more often associated with headaches. In one such study, researchers surveyed 212 healthcare workers (47 males and 165 females) asking about presence of headaches with N95 mask use, duration of the headaches, type of headaches and if the person had preexisting headaches.2

They found that about a third of the workers developed headaches with use of the mask, most had preexisting headaches that were worsened by the mask wearing, and 60% required pain medications for relief. As to the cause of the headaches, while straps and pressure from the mask could be causative, the bulk of the evidence points toward hypoxia and/or hypercapnia as the cause. That is, a reduction in blood oxygenation (hypoxia) or an elevation in blood C02 (hypercapnia). It is known that the N95 mask, if worn for hours, can reduce blood oxygenation as much as 20%, which can lead to a loss of consciousness, as happened to the hapless fellow driving around alone in his car wearing an N95 mask, causing him to pass out, and to crash his car and sustain injuries. I am sure that we have several cases of elderly individuals or any person with poor lung function passing out, hitting their head. This, of course, can lead to death.

A more recent study involving 159 healthcare workers aged 21 to 35 years of age found that 81% developed headaches from wearing a face mask.3   Some had pre-existing headaches that were precipitated by the masks. All felt like the headaches affected their work performance.

Unfortunately, no one is telling the frail elderly and those with lung diseases, such as COPD, emphysema or pulmonary fibrosis, of these dangers when wearing a facial mask of any kind—which can cause a severe worsening of lung function. This also includes lung cancer patients and people having had lung surgery, especially with partial resection or even the removal of a whole lung.

While most agree that the N95 mask can cause significant hypoxia and hypercapnia, another study of surgical masks found significant reductions in blood oxygen as well. In this study, researchers examined the blood oxygen levels in 53 surgeons using an oximeter. They measured blood oxygenation before surgery as well as at the end of surgeries.4 The researchers found that the mask reduced the blood oxygen levels (pa02) significantly. The longer the duration of wearing the mask, the greater the fall in blood oxygen levels.

The importance of these findings is that a drop in oxygen levels (hypoxia) is associated with an impairment in immunity. Studies have shown that hypoxia can inhibit the type of main immune cells used to fight viral infections called the CD4+ T-lymphocyte. This occurs because the hypoxia increases the level of a compound called hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), which inhibits T-lymphocytes and stimulates a powerful immune inhibitor cell called the Tregs. . This sets the stage for contracting any infection, including COVID-19 and making the consequences of that infection much graver. In essence, your mask may very well put you at an increased risk of infections and if so, having a much worse outcome.5,6,7

People with cancer, especially if the cancer has spread, will be at a further risk from prolonged hypoxia as the cancer grows best in a microenvironment that is low in oxygen. Low oxygen also promotes inflammation which can promote the growth, invasion and spread of cancers.8,9  Repeated episodes of hypoxia has been proposed as a significant factor in atherosclerosis and hence increases all cardiovascular (heart attacks) and cerebrovascular (strokes) diseases.10

There is another danger to wearing these masks on a daily basis, especially if worn for several hours. When a person is infected with a respiratory virus, they will expel some of the virus with each breath. If they are wearing a mask, especially an N95 mask or other tightly fitting mask, they will be constantly rebreathing the viruses, raising the concentration of the virus in the lungs and the nasal passages. We know that people who have the worst reactions to the coronavirus have the highest concentrations of the virus early on. And this leads to the deadly cytokine storm in a selected number.

It gets even more frightening. Newer evidence suggests that in some cases the virus can enter the brain.11,12 In most instances it enters the brain by way of the olfactory nerves (smell nerves), which connect directly with the area of the brain dealing with recent memory and memory consolidation. By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.13

It is evident from this review that there is insufficient evidence that wearing a mask of any kind can have a significant impact in preventing the spread of this virus. The fact that this virus is a relatively benign infection for the vast majority of the population and that most of the at-risk group also survive, from an infectious disease and epidemiological standpoint, by letting the virus spread through the healthier population we will reach a herd immunity level rather quickly that will end this pandemic quickly and prevent a return next winter. During this time, we need to protect the at-risk population by avoiding close contact, boosting their immunity with compounds that boost cellular immunity and in general, care for them.

One should not attack and insult those who have chosen not to wear a mask, as these studies suggest that is the wise choice to make.

References

  1. bin-Reza F et al. The use of mask and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: A systematic review of the scientific evidence. Resp Viruses 2012;6(4):257-67.
  2. Zhu JH et al. Effects of long-duration wearing of N95 respirator and surgical facemask: a pilot study. J Lung Pulm Resp Res 2014:4:97-100.
  3. Ong JJY et al. Headaches associated with personal protective equipment- A cross-sectional study among frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19. Headache 2020;60(5):864-877.
  4. Bader A et al. Preliminary report on surgical mask induced deoxygenation during major surgery. Neurocirugia 2008;19:12-126.
  5. Shehade H et al. Cutting edge: Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 negatively regulates Th1 function. J Immunol 2015;195:1372-1376.
  6. Westendorf AM et al. Hypoxia enhances immunosuppression by inhibiting CD4+ effector T cell function and promoting Treg activity. Cell Physiol Biochem 2017;41:1271-84.
  7. Sceneay J et al. Hypoxia-driven immunosuppression contributes to the pre-metastatic niche. Oncoimmunology 2013;2:1 e22355.
  8. Blaylock RL. Immunoexcitatory mechanisms in glioma proliferation, invasion and occasional metastasis. Surg Neurol Inter 2013;4:15.
  9. Aggarwal BB. Nucler factor-kappaB: The enemy within. Cancer Cell 2004;6:203-208.
  10. Savransky V et al. Chronic intermittent hypoxia induces atherosclerosis. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2007;175:1290-1297.
  11. Baig AM et al. Evidence of the COVID-19 virus targeting the CNS: Tissue distribution, host-virus interaction, and proposed neurotropic mechanisms. ACS Chem Neurosci 2020;11:7:995-998.
  12. Wu Y et al. Nervous system involvement after infection with COVID-19 and other coronaviruses. Brain Behavior, and Immunity, In press.
  13. Perlman S et al. Spread of a neurotropic murine coronavirus into the CNS via the trigeminal and olfactory nerves. Virology 1989;170:556-560.

blank

Dr. Russell Blaylock, author of The Blaylock Wellness Report newsletter, is a nationally recognized board-certified neurosurgeon, health practitioner, author, and lecturer. He attended the Louisiana State University School of Medicine and completed his internship and neurological residency at the Medical University of South Carolina. For 26 years, practiced neurosurgery in addition to having a nutritional practice. He recently retired from his neurosurgical duties to devote his full attention to nutritional research.

Dr. Blaylock has authored four books, Excitotoxins: The Taste That KillsHealth and Nutrition Secrets That Can Save Your LifeNatural Strategies for Cancer Patients, and his most recent work, Cellular and Molecular Biology of Autism Spectrum Disorders.

~~~

URGENT! Full Disclosure from ‘INSIDE’ – Dr. Rashid A. Buttar

URGENT! Full Disclosure from ‘INSIDE’ – Dr. Rashid A. Buttar

Streamed live 20 hours ago
293K subscribers

https://youtu.be/UtbtpLLFyuQ

Join IADFW – AskDrA

This is the most important thing that has come down in the last 24 hours. House Resolution 6666 introduced into congress by Congressman Bobby Rush (Democrat from IL) introducing the

TRACE Act [COVID-19 Testing, Reaching, And Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act].
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6666/text?r=2&s=1

Download this video and get it to everyone! They are going to try and come into our homes. WHO warned us 2 weeks ago. Rolling this out in Ventura County in California. And already hiring civilians to do this…$22.00 + Benefits!

Connect with Dr. Rashid A Buttar on his weekly livestream broadcast starting at 8:15 pm Monday evenings.

New York time and join the movement to make the CHANGE the WORLD is waiting for!

 

 

~~~

Phoenix Boulay

They are testing this in Massachusetts, voluntarily at this point.

SEC. 2. COVID–19 testing and contact tracing using mobile health units.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6666/text?r=2&s=1
SEC. 2. COVID–19 testing and contact tracing using mobile health units.
(f) Definitions.—In this section:
2) The term “emergency period” has the meaning given to that term in
section 1135(g)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–5(g)(1)(B)).

CLICK -IT LEADS HERE (THANKS @bassman777 for this link)
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:42%20section:1320b-5%20edition:prelim)

Giac Hatanaka

It took me awhile to find the actual part in the bill about mandating the separation of families. You have to click a link towards the end of the HR6666 bill that takes you to a subsection, where a subsection within that, among a slew of legal technicalities, mandates “a transfer of an individual who has not been stabilized in violation of subsection (c) of such section if the transfer is necessitated by the circumstances of the declared emergency in the emergency area during the emergency period.” Shady fuckers.

The section is here:

(2) The term “emergency period” has the meaning given to that term in section 1135(g)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–5(g)(1)(B)). When you follow the link, it takes to to the following page: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:42%20section:1320b-5%20edition:prelim)

Look under section (b)

(3). That is where it references ”transfer”. Here is the entirety of it:

(b) Secretarial authority To the extent necessary to accomplish the purpose specified in subsection (a), the Secretary is authorized, subject to the provisions of this section, to temporarily waive or modify the application of, with respect to health care items and services furnished by a health care provider (or classes of health care providers) in any emergency area (or portion of such an area) during any portion of an emergency period, the requirements of subchapters XVIII, XIX, or XXI, or any regulation thereunder (and the requirements of this subchapter other than this section, and regulations thereunder, insofar as they relate to such subchapters), pertaining to-

(1)(A) conditions of participation or other certification requirements for an individual health care provider or types of providers,
(B) program participation and similar requirements for an individual health care provider or types of providers, and
(C) pre-approval requirements;
(2) requirements that physicians and other health care professionals be licensed in the State in which they provide such services, if they have equivalent licensing in another State and are not affirmatively excluded from practice in that State or in any State a part of which is included in the emergency area;
(3) actions under section 1395dd of this title (relating to examination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and women in labor) for-

(A) a transfer of an individual who has not been stabilized in violation of subsection (c) of such section if the transfer is necessitated by the circumstances of the declared emergency in the emergency area during the emergency period; or
(B) the direction or relocation of an individual to receive medical screening in an alternative location- (i) pursuant to an appropriate State emergency preparedness plan; or (ii) in the case of a public health emergency described in subsection (g)(1)(B) that involves a pandemic infectious disease, pursuant to a State pandemic preparedness plan or a plan referred to in clause (i), whichever is applicable in the State;

~~~~

H.R.6666 – COVID-19 Testing, Reaching, And Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act

H. R. 6666 (House Resolution)

To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID–19, and related activities such as contact tracing, through mobile health units and, as necessary, at individuals’ residences, and for other purposes.

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID–19, and related activities such as contact tracing, through mobile health units and, as necessary, at individuals’ residences, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6666/text?r=2&s=1

~~~

This is HUGE! Our Take on Microsoft’s Filing of Patent #060606

Apr 17, 2020
18.9K subscribers
https://youtu.be/EZiqR45kbiY

We uploaded this same video to our other channels and it has been trending on BitChute. It was trending #1 for the day, and currently is #3 for the week (top English language vid) and #7 for the month. Pray for the Lord’s purposes to be served. https://www.bitchute.com/video/WzUPvr…

——————————————————————————–

We give consideration to this official document in the brightening light of the biblical texts (like Rev. 13, Mat. 24, Jude) for its “Mark of the Beast” potential. International Patent: wo/2020/060606 * cryptocurrency system using body activity https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/e…

Applicants: Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC Abstract:

“Human body activity associated with a task provided to a user may be used in a mining process of a cryptocurrency system. A server may provide a task to a device of a user which is communicatively coupled to the server. A sensor communicatively coupled to or comprised in the device of the user may sense body activity of the user. Body activity data may be generated based on the sensed body activity of the user. The cryptocurrency system communicatively coupled to the device of the user may verify if the body activity data satisfies one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system, and award cryptocurrency to the user whose body activity data is verified.”

Curious about the pending reset of time? See “The Pending Reset of Time – The Essential Guide” https://theopenscroll.blogspot.com/20…

Arthur Firstenberg: CHOOSING LIFE | International Appeal to Stop 5G On Earth and in Space

Please note the tags as a clue to subjects discussed in this article, and donate if you can. ~PB


The world, for the past several months
, has been distracted from the existential question looming ever-closer on the horizon: do we embrace life, in all its mysteries, pleasures, and storms, or do we bury it? Do we join our hands round the Earth, or do we wash them twenty times a day? Do we mingle together in sickness and in health, or do we hide our heads in the sands of our masks and social distancing, and pretend that our lives and our future do not depend on our physical connections with people, and with birds and bats and flowers and fishes that sustain one another and keep this world going?

We have decisions to make.

While we have all been preoccupied with the coronavirus, a giant ozone hole has developed this spring over the Arctic, unprecedented in size and duration. This is letting high levels of ultraviolet radiation from the sun reach the surface of the Earth. The UV index is higher than normal over a large part of the northern hemisphere. This may in part be the result of the emissions from the hundreds of rocket launches that have taken place in the past few years, largely in the northern hemisphere. About 225 rocket launches are planned for 2020. Will we continue to permit this? Or, once we emerge from our homes and the quarantines are lifted, will we stop?

Instead of mingling together in schools and markets and restaurants and parks and churches, we have retreated into our cell phones and our wireless computers, substituting radiation for life, while the wireless web, on Earth and in space, continues to be woven. Will we continue to permit this? Or, once we emerge from our homes and the quarantines are lifted, will we stop?

INTERNATIONAL DAY OF ACTION, JUNE 20-21, 2020

  


“Don’t Push the River, It Flows by Itself,” wrote Barry Stevens in her 1970 book by that name. Well, sometimes even the river needs a little push. A new organization has just been formed, called End Cellphones Here On Earth (ECHOEarth), whose members do not own cell phones and whose mission is to end the root cause of the wireless web that is punching holes in our atmosphere and bathing us all in radiation.

ECHOEarth has set the solstice, June 20-21, 2020, as Cancel-Your-Cell-Phone-Account Day, the day we invite you to get off this train and change direction. Details will follow in the next newsletter.

UPDATE ON SATELLITES


SpaceX, which already had 360 satellites in orbit, had planned to launch 60 more on April 2 but delayed the launch due to the coronavirus situation. That launch of 60 satellites took place yesterday, bringing the number in orbit to 420.

Last Friday, on April 17, SpaceX submitted a new application to the Federal Communications Commission, requesting permission to lower the altitude of some of its planned satellites. It previously was going to orbit what it calls its “first-generation” satellites in two tiers — one tier at 550 kilometers (340 miles) in altitude, and a second tier at 1200 kilometers (750 miles) in altitude. Now SpaceX wants to place all 4,408 of its first-generation satellites at the lower altitude. One of its stated reasons is to make fewer of the satellites visible from any point on the earth at any given time. However, the lower the satellites are, the brighter they will be. And the more of them are in the ionosphere (which extends up to about 1000 kilometers), the greater the impact on life below.

OneWeb, which has launched 74 satellites, has declared bankruptcy and laid off most of its employees after failing to obtain expected funding due to the downturn in the economy caused by the coronavirus shutdown.

CORONAVIRUS: SCIENCE, POLICY AND POLITICS


Many people are afraid of even asking whether 5G is playing a role in the COVID-19 disease that has shut down much of the world. It is similar to the fear that has prevented people from questioning the orders to stay home, wear masks, and keep six feet away from each other.

I am about truth, wherever I find it, wherever it may lead, because our world is at stake, and life itself — physical, mental, emotional and spiritual — is being dismantled. Conspiracies have no place in this effort. Neither does fear.

My opinions, based on my reading of the scientific and medical literature, as best as I can determine, are these:

  • Did 5G cause the coronavirus? No.
  • Does 5G cause disease similar to the coronavirus? Yes.
  • Did COVID-19 originate in bats? No.
  • Is COVID-19 a recombinant RNA virus, created in a laboratory, intentionally or unintentionally, as part of a research program whose purpose was to protect the population? Did it escape accidentally from a virology laboratory in Wuhan, China? Probably.

The measures that have been put in place, and accepted without question, are ineffective, destructive, and anti-life.

Masks do not protect the wearer. Medical masks are ineffective against viruses, and cloth masks provide breeding grounds for them. A 2015 study in the British Medical Journal found that healthcare workers caught viruses from their patients 13 times more often if they wore a cloth mask than if they wore a medical mask, and a Chinese study found that a medical mask was no more protective against viruses than wearing no mask at all.

The World Health Organization warns that wearing a medical mask “may create a false sense of security” against COVID-19 and that “no evidence is available on its usefulness to protect non-sick persons.”

The N95 respirator, recommended for medical workers, requires training to use properly and “without training, the masks could not only expose workers to the virus but also lull them into thinking they are protected,” according to doctors at the Harvard School of Public Health. In practice, even the N95 mask has been found to be ineffective in preventing the transmission of viruses. A review of six clinical studies, published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, found that medical workers caught viruses from their patients just as often when they used N95 respirators as when they used ordinary medical masks.

Masks are harmful to the wearer. COVID-19 kills by causing severe hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the blood). People wearing masks rebreathe some of their exhaled air, lowering the amount of oxygen they are breathing.

“Wearing respirators come[s] with a host of physiological and psychological burdens. These can interfere with task performances and reduce work efficiency. These burdens can even be severe enough to cause life-threatening conditions if not ameliorated,” wrote the author of a 2016 article in the Journal of Biological Engineering. When the N95 respirator was tested in use in 2010, the “dead-space oxygen and carbon dioxide levels did not meet the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s ambient workplace standards.”

Ventilators do not work and are harmful. Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell quit his job in the Intensive Care Unit at Maimonides Medical Center in Brooklyn because he was required to put his COVID-19 patients on ventilators that he felt were killing them because the air pressure was damaging their lungs. His coronavirus patients all had severe hypoxia but healthy respiratory muscles: they needed oxygen, he said, but not pressure.

“COVID-19 lung disease, as far as I can see, is not a pneumonia,” he said, but seems to be “some kind of viral-induced disease most resembling high altitude sickness… These patients are slowly being starved of oxygen … and while they look like patients absolutely on the brink of death, they do not look like patients dying of pneumonia.” Italian doctors agree: “Patients on ventilators deteriorate anyway, in an unexplained way… Most of these patients are plainly hypoxic.”


PCR tests are not accurate.
A March 25, 2020 paper by Carver and Jones reported that it is not possible to assess the accuracy of PCR tests because “There are little public data on the false positive and false negative rates of the various RT-PCR based tests.” A false positive test means that you are diagnosed with COVID-19 when you don’t actually have it. One of the only studies to date that has attempted to estimate the frequency of false positives is Zhuang et al., “Potential false-positive rate among the ‘asymptomatic infected individuals’ in close contacts of COVID-19 patients”, Chinese Journal of Epidemiology, 2020, 41(4): 485-488 (in Chinese). They concluded that up to 80 percent of non-symptomatic people who test positive for the coronavirus may not actually have it.


Shutdowns do not have any effect.
Japan, which did not shut down until April 6 and then only with voluntary measures, has 2 COVID-19 deaths per million population. China, which shut down in December, has 3 deaths per million population. Belarus, which never shut down, has 4 per million. South Korea, which has only voluntary measures, has 5 per million. Iran, which shut down in early March, has 62 per million. Sweden, which did not shut down, has 156 per million. Switzerland, which did shut down, has 165 per million. Belgium, which did shut down, has 503 deaths per million population. Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, all close to China, have no COVID-19 deaths at all. Vietnam shut down in early February, Laos shut down in late March, and Cambodia has never shut down at all. In the U.S., South Dakota, which has not shut down at all, has four times as many cases, but fewer deaths, than neighboring Montana, which is completely locked down.


Death rates in the United States have been going down, not up, since the beginning of the year.
If you pay attention to the news, you might assume that record numbers of people are dying. The opposite is true. Not only has overall mortality for the United States been going steadily downward since January, but mortality has been substantially lower this year than last year. These are weekly mortality statistics for the United States from the Centers for Disease Control:

Week                   Number of Deaths 2019           Number of Deaths 2020

1                                  58,291                                           59,087
2                                  58,351                                           59,151
3                                  58,194                                           57,616
4                                  57,837                                           57,000
5                                  58,128                                           56,426
6                                  58,492                                           56,962
7                                  57,917                                           55,981
8                                  57,858                                           55,494
9                                  57,920                                           54,834
10                                  58,490                                           54,157
11                                  57,872                                           52,198
12                                  57,087                                           51,602
13                                  56,672                                           52,285
14                                  56,595                                           49,292
15                                  55,477                                           47,574
TOTAL                             865,181                                         819,659


We are told that 37,308 people have died this year from COVID-19 through April 18, yet actually 45,522 fewer people have died this year than last year during the same period of time.


RF radiation and COVID-19 cause similar disease.
In my last newsletter (“Is the Sky Really Falling?”), I noted some effects of COVID-19 that are similar to effects of radio waves. The list of effects in common has grown, and includes headaches, dizziness, nausea, digestive problems, muscle pain, tachycardia, hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, strokes, and seizures. As many as two-thirds of people who test positive for COVID-19 have lost their sense of smell, often without any other symptoms. Patients are presenting with mental confusion, without any respiratory symptoms at all. Patients are presenting with diarrhea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. When patients with any of these symptoms test positive for the coronavirus, their illnesses are being attributed to that virus. But these are all classic symptoms of radio wave sickness. When both the virus and RF radiation are present, the disease should be attributed to both.

And RF radiation and COVID-19 both cause hypoxia. COVID-19 impairs oxygen absorption by the blood, and RF radiation impairs oxygen use by the cells. COVID-19 would not be so severe were it not for the radiation.

Recently, there is a new symptom that is being attributed to the virus that is exactly what one would expect to see from millimeter waves: a “fizzing” sensation throughout the body. It is being described as a “buzzing sensation,” “a burning feeling,” and “an electric sensation in the skin.” It is probably wrongly being attributed to the virus, and is due instead to 5G.

It is a fact that 5G was turned on in Wuhan, China on November 1, 2019, and that the first known COVID-19 patient became ill there on November 17. It is a fact that there is a research virology lab in Wuhan, and that researchers there coauthored a paper in 2015 with American researchers from Chapel Hill, North Carolina describing a hybrid coronavirus that they had created by attaching a spike protein from bats to a SARS coronavirus. Zheng-Li Shi, the lead researcher from Wuhan, said in an interview in Scientific American that she had worried that COVID-19 was a virus that had escaped from her lab, but she reassured the world that she had checked and it did not resemble any of the viruses that she had collected in bat caves. Yet in the next sentence she justified her claim that COVID-19 came from bats by saying that it was almost identical to a virus that she had collected in a bat cave in Yunnan.

The SARS virus has escaped from high-level containment facilities in China multiple times. As revealed by the Washington Post on April 14, 2020, U.S. Embassy officials had warned in 2018 that sloppy safety protocols for handling contagious viruses in the Wuhan lab “represented a risk of a new SARS-like pandemic.”

It is also a fact that the animal market in Wuhan does not sell bats. A YouTube video that has been shared on social media that shows bats being sold for meat at a market was actually filmed in Langowan, Indonesia, and not in China at all.

In short, 5G is part of the coronavirus equation, and everything that we have been doing to address the pandemic has more to do with politics and fear than with reality. It is time to re-open society, to take off our masks, and to open our eyes to what is really happening to our world.

DONATE  

Arthur Firstenberg

P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
USA
phone: +1 505-471-0129
info@cellphonetaskforce.org
https://www.5gSpaceAppeal.org

A pdf version of this newsletter is available here:

 

Keep bringing in the Light | FM144

April 17, 2020

Keep bringing in the Light | FM144

Historical times that we are currently experiencing. The world is definitely in a fundamental change – people are waking up.

The worldwide meditations two weeks ago contributed to this, although they were massively attacked … before, during and afterwards.

Unfortunately many Lightworker groups (e.g. on Facebook) are still infiltrated, which of course cannot be stopped a 100%, but admins can spot infiltrators and act accordingly, if they find any.

In the run-up to the meditations, videos were produced to present mass meditations as dangerous. Many of them were tried to be placed into Lightworker groups to make people insecure in order to prevent them from participating.

There were also discussions that people are not participating in MMs because they’re supposed to be “against” COVID-19, and everything that is “against” something is not in “Light and Love” and cannot be in the “Highest Purpose” and so forth and so on … Lightworkers probably know these discussions.


I don’t want to go into this in detail, just again this much: it is scientifically proven that mass meditations with positive intentions also have a positive effect on the physical environment:

https://thriveglobal.com/stories/the-undeniable-power-of-mass-meditation-3-top-reasons-you-wanna-try-it/

https://www.thewayofmeditation.com.au/scientific-evidence-mass-meditation-can-reduce-war-and-terrorism

https://positivepsychology.com/benefits-of-meditation/

And as far as this “against something” issue is concerned, much of it is simply quibbling, much of it was taken out of context (in fact, the main goal of most MMs was  the harmonization of the events!) and even when something is done “against” something … of course this will work too, you can also order from the Universe/Source that a certain situation is avoided… the Universe/Source is not “stupid” (to put it exaggeratedly), it will not send you more of the bad things if you make it very clear that you “don’t want bad things to happen” (but again, this would be a completely separate topic).

Many such discussions are pointless, as the other party will not be convinced of the opposite anyway – they literally rob you of your energy (which is also be a sign of an attack/infiltration) and keep you from doing more important things (like sharing links or create videos for MMs).

A clear sign of infiltration is when you have people in your (Facebook) group who do not post anything for months, sometimes years, until there is a MM. Suddenly such people are activated like sleeper cells (often through Archons) and are spamming groups participating in MMs with negative comments or links to such videos as mentioned above, which present MMs as dangerous. After the MM they wouldn’t post anything for months again… clear signs of infiltration, so happened in many Lightworker groups on Facebook or on Instagram two weeks ago, admins should act immediately if they spot such activities.

However, these disruptive actions in advance could not prevent the success and the enormous number of participants in the MMs – although attacks also happened during them, and also afterwards. It is usually the case that at the same time as major mediations take place certain physical and also non-physical groups of Dark Ones will begin to ritualize in order to counteract such meditations.

These attacks are usually very strong in the beginning, but the more people join the meditation, the brighter and stronger the Light becomes and overlays these attacks.

Nevertheless, many Lightworkers (especially Key Lightworkers) can still be attacked, because the Archons go completely berserk during and after such meditations.

That is why it is important to protect yourself energetically and after a MM to consciously separate yourself from it and all other external energies/external connections during an own meditation (and no, this doesn’t mean that MMs are dangerous, it’s because they are so effective that the Dark Ones will do everything to stop them or at least to take revenge on certain Lightworkers for participation… but if you protect yourself properly, it will not become too much of a problem).


It’s also a good idea to mentally seal all energetic portals that lead to oneself as well as to mentally erase all energetic traces that one has left on the non-physical planes (so that you cannot be traced back by the Archons) and to recharge yourself energetically, for example by going out a lot into nature or connecting with the Prime Source or the Goddess during a meditation, or by chanting or whatever other methods you use to recharge yourself energetically.

Another reason for attacks is the fact that, out of fear of the incoming Light, the top echelons of the Dark Ones crawled under the Earth’s surface, where they are constantly ritualizing now.

These rituals create negative entities on the non-physical planes, which are then released into the Grid to attack Lightworkers. They virtually conjure up hell and inject it into the Grid to make it as difficult as possible for the Light Force.

But that still doesn’t change the fact that the wind has already turned, and the meditation was definitely a game changer.

The plan of a NWO with forced vaccinations and microchips is disintegrating live in front of our eyes, no matter how much propaganda they might make for it.



The number of people waking up is now so large that the social media accounts of Bill and Melinda Gates have all their hands full with deleting critical comments (which by far exceed positive comments).


Also the plan to use influencers and celebrities on social media to make propaganda for mass vaccinations turns out to be a boomerang, because the commentary columns are just full of critical comments too, and many influencers/celebs already had to withdraw their videos.

That’s why the Cabal is now getting its major Illuminati artists (led by Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta aka Lady Gaga) out of the moth box, organizing a big virtual concert this weekend:

https://www.who.int/news-room/events/detail/2020/04/18/default-calendar/one-world-together-at-home-global-special

The problem is that more and more people do not respond too well to Propaganda and Satanists, see Microsoft’s advertising for Mixed Reality featuring Marina Abramovic:

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/485930-microsoft-pulls-ad-unpopular-abramovic/

Reason for this are also great documentaries like this one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=MY8Nfzcn1qQ

The mainstream narrative that COVID-19 was created naturally and has nothing to do with a bioweapon is also becoming more and more unstable (even if much of it is counter-propaganda and mudslinging, but it’s about bringing out the idea that the virus could be artificially created as well as spread intentionally):

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/coronavirus-wuhan-lab-china-compete-us-sources

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8120505/Russia-blames-BRITAIN-coronavirus-outbreak.html

The 5G issue is also causing tensions, with some citizens taking the issue into their own hands:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/06/coronavirus-uk-cell-towers-set-on-fire-amid-5g-conspiracy-theories.html

As you can see, there is a tremendous crackling inside the Grid as more and more people are waking up now and not putting up with things anymore.

Of course the goal is to bring everything harmoniously across the stage, however, the awareness and resistance has passed a critical point, which may cause natural tension in correlation with the suppression through the Grid.

In the meantime, most of the Dark Ones have literally moved into the basement of the planet, which is good, because In Feng Shui, the basement also represents the past, everything above represents the future, and in that case it would be the ships of Galactic Confederation in the skies (which are closer now than some might imagine).

So keep bringing the Light in, be aware things can still get very chaotic, so stay centred and calm, we are definitely heading in the right direction … and we definitely can make a difference!

https://fm144.blogspot.com/2020/04/keep-bringing-in-light.html

Kommentare