COVID Criminals to Face ‘Crimes Against Humanity’ Charges: Dr Fleming

Crime, Fraud, Freedom, Genocide, Weapons

COVID Criminals to Face ‘Crimes Against Humanity’ Charges: Dr Fleming

FORBIDDENTV.NET

16 hours ago
5,465 views
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/covid-criminals-to-face-crimes-against-humanity-charges-dr-fleming/

The COVID “vaccine” is not something that happened overnight, at “Warp Speed”. It is the culmination of decades of collaboration among several individuals and institutions, including Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, Ralph Baric, Peter Daszak, NIH, DARPA, the Rockefeller Foundation, Johns Hopkins University, the Wuhan Institute of Virology and others, in addition to the pharmaceutical companies who, like all of the above are subsidizing this global genocide with the tax dollars of the very citizens being extinguished.

This is the modern warfare model!

Dr Richard Fleming, PhD, MD, JD joins journalist, Alex Newman to say that the people responsible for weaponizing and releasing the COVID-19 bio-weapon against humanity will be held accountable.

Together with Dr Luc Montagnier and others, Dr Fleming, who is a medical doctor and attorney has filed for joint submission to the International Criminal Court (The Hague) alleging that Governments worldwide are complicit in genocide, crimes against humanity and breaches of the Nuremberg Code.

The case is being joined by lawyers who have filed similar Requests for Investigation to the ICC from the UK, France, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, plus a group of Holocaust Survivors, with other countries set to join soon.

Dr. Fleming urges viewers to get involved and ensure that those who sought to kill, steal, destroy and enslave with this diabolical tool known as SARS-CoV2.

In the interview, Dr. Fleming also talks about his new book, ‘Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon? A Scientific and Forensic Investigation’, already a best seller, exposing the true nature of COVID and what is really going on.

The specifics of those accused of being perpetrators of Crimes Against Humanity are currently confidential as the ICC considers the submitted material.

***

Plandemic Criminals – Indictable Evidence

Dr. Richard M. Fleming has given all the indictable evidence we need to start arresting and convicting the criminals behind the current plandemic that has devastated the entire world economically and killed and maimed millions globally. His book: Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon, A Scientific and Forensic Investigation provides the blow-by-blow plan to create a viral bioweapon of mass destruction. He provides the proof of the U. S. sources of funding to the criminals who set out to violate all laws concerning gain-of-function biological research to create a laboratory created synthetic virus that was designed to kill as many people as possible. He offers the original documents that prove Anthony Fauci and his gang of bio-criminals at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and many other U. S. Federal agencies used to gain grants and patents to turn public laboratories into killing machines with U. S. taxpayer monies. He also gives the dates and contents of publications wherein these criminals brag about their research to the world without shame and with seeming impunity.

We have summarized and condensed the excellent work of Dr. Fleming into a readable form for layman who might not be familiar with medical terms concerning this deadly research. Fleming does not draw conclusions or demand judicial action to be taken against these “war actors”, but you will yourself, no doubt, come to the same conclusions that we did when presented with the overwhelming evidence that shows the broad trail of crimes that have led to our current world dilemma. You will surely ask the question, Why aren’t these criminals in jail and being held accountable for their consciously perpetrated crimes? This question, which is inevitable, needs to be addressed by law enforcement, the Department of Justice, the U. S. Congress, the president of the United States and any honest judges left in this country to defend U. S. Civil Rights and the United States Constitution. These crimes must be prosecuted if freedom and life as we know it are to continue to go on in America.

***

In 2002, following the SARS-CoV-1 outbreak in China, Dr. Shi Zhengli-Li and colleagues at the Wuhan Institute of Virology began investigating how SARS-CoV-1 was transmitted. In particular Zhengli was interested how SARS-CoV-1 was transmitted from person to person. To do this, she developed chimeric (Gain-of-Function) coronaviruses using human immunodeficiency, virus-based pseudovirus systems (laboratory man-made viruses) with the cell lines of people, civet cats, and horseshoe bats. In March 2004, the US Health and Human Services agency announced that it was going to create the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity to be managed by the National Institutes of Health, thus consciously violating U. S. laws prohibiting such research. In 2005, Dr. Ralph Baric published a paper declaring he could alter the genome of coronaviruses. In 2006, using chimeric (Gain-of-Function) research, Chinese scientists in Wuhan reported their ability to combine parts of four different viruses into a single viral genome. They combined parts of four viruses: hepatitis C, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1, AIDS), SARS-CoV-1, and SARS-CoV-2. Thus, COVID-19 was made in a laboratory as an attempt to kill human beings.

When the Swine Flu vaccine of the mid-1970s produced neurological damage, including Guillain-Barre syndrome, following the first twenty-five deaths, the swine flu vaccine and vaccination program was stopped by the U. S. government. Today the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) shows thousands of deaths following SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations with over 400,000 experiencing severe adverse effects, and yet, this CDC provide data has not ended the use of COVID vaccines (DNA manipulation fake-vaccine) and the harmful vaccination program killing and harming Americans.

Two published papers looking at the consequences of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein penetrating the brain of humanized mice and rhesus macaques show brain inflammation, mad cow disease (Spongiform encephalopathy), and Alzheimer disease. (Mariano Caroosino et al., January 2021 & Ingrid HCHM Philippens et al., May 5, 2021.) In other words, even though all of the mice showed damaging inflammation in their lungs, all the animals died due to brain damage with the virus entering the brain though the olfactory system (nose).

It is critical to understand that it makes no difference whether the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2  is introduced into the body via person-to-person transfer or via injection of biologicals (vaccines), the effect is the same.

In 2012, an investigation into Gain-of-Function research resulted in a voluntary moratorium that lasted almost one year and ended in January 2013 due to the dangers of biological experimentation concerning all viruses. In 2014, shortly thereafter, Ralph Baric and Chinese researchers published a paper demonstrating the differences between spike proteins that can infect bats and those capable of infecting people. This research was funded by National Institutes of Health grants RO1AI089728 and R21AI109094. In October of 2014, only one year after lifting the moratorium, the Obama Administration placed a ban on Gain-of-Function research after it was discovered that the CDC had accidentally exposed workers to Anthrax and “unwittingly” shipped out samples of influenza virus contaminated with the deadly H5N1 virus.

In 2015, Baric and Zhengli both announced they had “reengineered, through Gain-of-Function, the spike protein of coronavirus so they could infect human cells.” (Y. Yang et al., Journal of Virology 89, no 17, 2015) This research was paid for by NIH grants RO1AI089728 and RO1AI110700. Recommendations for the oversight of Gain-of-Function research were made on April 7, 2016, and approved on March 15, 2016, by the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity. Dr. Anthony Fauci is an ex officio member of that board. But this notwithstanding, the research moved forward in America and China.

Laws Concerning Gain-of-Function Research

The U. S. law that will put bioweapon makers and funders into jail is:

United States Federal Code 12 U.S.C. Chapter 10–175 – which expressly prohibits such biological weapons and makes it a criminal offence.

“175. Prohibitions with respect to biological weapons

(a) In General. – Whoever knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a foreign state or any organization to do so, or attempts, threatens, or conspires to do the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both.”

Other provisions for prosecution of bioweapon makers, producers, conspirators:

Biological Weapons Convention Treaty of 1969 – signed and ratified by the United States of America in 1972. It is a violation of the treaty to develop, acquire, retain, or produce any biological agent or toxin that has no justification for prevention or peaceful purposes.

The Nuremberg Code 1947 – includes such principles as informed consent, absence of coercion, properly formulated scientific experimentation, and demands beneficence towards experiment participates.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights-1976 – provides for respect for civil and political rights of individuals, including the right to life, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, electoral rights, and rights to due process.

In October of 2014, the US government issued a policy statement regarding Gain-of-Function research including the following restrictions:

“New [US government] funding will not be released for gain-of-function research projects that may be reasonably anticipated to confer attributes to influenza, MERS, or SARS viruses such that the virus would have enhanced pathogenicity and/or transmissibility in mammals via the respiratory route.”

Cast of Criminals

Dr. Anthony Fauci – NIH, NIAID

Robert Redfield – US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Toxic Substances)

Dr. Ralph Baric – Carolina Vaccine Institute at the University of North Carolina

Dr. Shi Zhengli-Li – Wuhan Institute of Virology

Dr. Deborah Birx – CDC, Coronavirus Coordinator, Division of Global HIV/AIDS

Dr. Shibe Jiang – Shanghai Medical School Fudan University

Dr. Fang Li – Beijing University

Peter Daszak – EcoHealth Alliance

Colonel David Franz – Deputy Commander of Fort Detrick, US Biological Weapons Division

Amongst many others…

Timeline of Crime

We can find the criminals behind the plandemic by looking at publications and documents from the Department of Defense, National Institute of Health (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Food and Drug Administration, Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, EcoHealth Alliance, U. S. Agency for International Development, Department of Commerce, Department of Agriculture, Department of the Interior, U. S. Patent and Trademark Office, National Biosurveillance Integration Center, and other federal agencies.

1974 – The first reported genetically altered (Gain-of-Function) virus QB phage was created.

1985 – Ralph Baric began working with coronaviruses in the mid-1980s. In 1985, while at the University of California (UCLA) conducted research on recombinant viruses, including coronaviruses which was paid for by the National Science Foundation and U. S. Public Health and Human Services agency (HHS) by grant A1 19244.

2000 – Researcher in Spain and Paul Ahlquist from the University of Wisconsin showed how combining complementary DNA with nuclear expression of RNA allowed the researchers to develop a synthetic virus. The spike protein of the virus was replaced with the spike protein from another virus creating a chimeric (Gain-of-Function) virus that infected the gastrointestinal system of pigs. The researchers discovered this could now be done with dogs, cats, and humans.

2000 – With funding from NIH (Grant A1 239476) Ralph Baric and others enhanced a transmissible gastroenteritis virus. This infective transmissible virus, produced synthetically in a laboratory, was indistinguishable from the wild-type virus.

2001 – German researchers used smallpox virus DNA to produce an infectious coronavirus using restriction enzymes that work like molecular scissors to cut DNA and ligate it into a vector. (Masters, 1999; Almazan et al., 2000; Yount et al., 2000). With this DNA manipulation, it became possible to rapidly generate a large collection of genetically modified coronaviruses. Expression of multiple subgenomic mRNAs in infected coronaviruses formed the basis of creating vector systems, each encoded with heterologous protein. These features could then be exploited in the development of a new class of RNA vaccine vectors.

2001 – In May, Ralph Baric and colleagues applied for a patent to manipulate genes and profit from genetic manipulation of plants, animals, bacteria, and viruses – including coronaviruses. The patent was granted on July 15, 2003. This research was supported by U. S. taxpayer monies.

2003 – Baric and others published research funded by NIH (grants A123946, GM63228, A126603) showing they could rescue SARS-CoV Urbani viruses by using reverse genetics. They then could fully clone SARS viruses. This process increased the infectivity for SARS-CoV-2 and has been shown to insert its genetic sequence into the human DNA. This research was funded by the NIH (1U19AI131135-01, 5R01MH104610-21).

2006 – Chinese researchers spliced four target cDNA segments together to form a single 1,200-nucleotide-long RNA sequence. This chimeric (Gain-of-Function) sequence included combining hepatitis C viruses, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1 AIDS), and SARS-CoV-2.

2007 – In May, a patent was granted for isolation of human SARS-Co-V-1 to the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services agency (HHS). This established the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test to find the virus. In April, 2020, the FDA issued an umbrella Emergency Use Authorization for PCR testing of SARS-Co-V-2.

2007 – Dr. Zhengli and colleagues in Australia demonstrated that insertions placed in spike proteins made it possible for SARS-CoV to infect human cells.

2013 – Baric and colleagues discovered four critical genes that were expressed following SARS-CoV infections that created lung damage through fibrin that caused blood clotting. This was funded by NIAID, NIH, HHS, and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (HHSN272200800060C; 5UL1RR02414).

2014 – In March, Baric applied for an international patent for the Methods and Compositions for Chimeric (Gain-of-Function) Coronavirus Spike Proteins with support from NIH grant U54AI057157.

2014 – Dr. Li Meng Yan discovers that SARS-CoV-1 was a genetically modified (Gain-of-Function) virus that was a bioweapon developed by the Chinese Communist Party, with SARS-CoV-2 being the upgraded version of this bioweapon.

2015 – Baric and Zhengli received funding from Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance and NIH to publish their research that had used reverse genetics to generate a pathogenic chimeric virus, formed from parts of various animals, that could not be controlled by the use of drugs and could cross the blood-brain barrier of humans. They concluded that these viruses were able “to replicate in human airway cultures, cause pathogenesis, and escape current therapeutics.” Further funding for this bioweapon came from National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, University of North Carolina, University of Texas Medical Branch, USAID, and the U. S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

2015 – In September, Zhengli and Baric reengineered, through mutations (Gain-of-Function), the spike protein of MERS to increase infectivity of humans through viral entry into human cells. (NIH Grants RO1AI089728, RO1AI110700).

2015 – Peter Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance denounce a laboratory origin of this virus insisting on a zoonotic (animal) origin of this bioweapon.

2012 – In January, Peter Daszak leads the World Health Organization “team of experts” to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and insists the great amount of missing documents concerning SARS-CoV-2 was irrelevant. No connection between SARS-CoV-2 and the Wuhan laboratory was found by Daszak’s team.

This timeline of crime is proof positive of the crimes against humanity that the Cast of Criminals and their agents have committed by creating a biological Weapon of Mass Destruction. The time has come for them to answer for their crimes.

Contributed by Alexandra Bruce

ContactAlex Newmananthony fauciBill GatesCovid-19DARPADr Richard FlemingICCInternational Criminal CourtJohns Hopkins UniversityNew AmericanNIHNuremberg CodeNuremberg TrialsPeter DaszakRalph BaricSARS-Cov-2the Rockefeller Foundationthe Wuhan Institute of Virology

PHYSICIANS DECLARATION GLOBAL COVID SUMMIT – ROME, ITALY -UPDATE 10/12/2021

International Alliance of Physicians and Medical Scientists
September, 2021
(view in Italian) (Slovak) (Dutch) (Spanish) (Croatian) (Chinese)

PHYSICIANS DECLARATION 
GLOBAL COVID SUMMIT – ROME, ITALY

[UPDATE: as of 2:30pm ET on 10/12 over 11,900 doctors & scientists have signed the Rome Declaration. Please join us by reading and signing below.]

WHEREAS, it is our utmost responsibility and duty to uphold and restore the dignity, integrity, art and science of medicine;

WHEREAS, there is an unprecedented assault on our ability to care for our patients;

WHEREAS, public policy makers have chosen to force a “one size fits all” treatment strategy, resulting in needless illness and death, rather than upholding fundamental concepts of the individualized, personalized approach to patient care which is proven to be safe and more effective;

WHEREAS, physicians and other health care providers working on the front lines, utilizing their knowledge of epidemiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology, are often first to identify new, potentially life saving treatments;

WHEREAS, physicians are increasingly being discouraged from engaging in open professional discourse and the exchange of ideas about new and emerging diseases, not only endangering the essence of the medical profession, but more importantly, more tragically, the lives of our patients;

WHEREAS, thousands of physicians are being prevented from providing treatment to their patients, as a result of barriers put up by pharmacies, hospitals, and public health agencies, rendering the vast majority of healthcare providers helpless to protect their patients in the face of disease.  Physicians are now advising their patients to simply go home (allowing the virus to replicate) and return when their disease worsens, resulting in hundreds of thousands of unnecessary patient deaths, due to failure-to-treat;

WHEREAS, this is not medicine. This is not care. These policies may actually constitute crimes against humanity.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS:

RESOLVED, that the physician-patient relationship must be restored. The very heart of medicine is this relationship, which allows physicians to best understand their patients and their illnesses, to formulate treatments that give the best chance for success, while the patient is an active participant in their care. 

RESOLVED, that the political intrusion into the practice of medicine and the physician/patient relationship must end. Physicians, and all health care providers, must be free to practice the art and science of medicine without fear of retribution, censorship, slander, or disciplinary action, including possible loss of licensure and hospital privileges, loss of insurance contracts and interference from government entities and organizations – which further prevent us from caring for patients in need. More than ever, the right and ability to exchange objective scientific findings, which further our understanding of disease, must be protected.

RESOLVED, that physicians must defend their right to prescribe treatment, observing the tenet FIRST, DO NO HARM. Physicians shall not be restricted from prescribing safe and effective treatments. These restrictions continue to cause unnecessary sickness and death. The rights of patients, after being fully informed about the risks and benefits of each option, must be restored to receive those treatments.

RESOLVED, that we invite physicians of the world and all health care providers to join us in this noble cause as we endeavor to restore trust, integrity and professionalism to the practice of medicine.

RESOLVED, that we invite the scientists of the world, who are skilled in biomedical research and uphold the highest ethical and moral standards, to insist on their ability to conduct and publish objective, empirical research without fear of reprisal upon their careers, reputations and livelihoods.

RESOLVED, that we invite patients, who believe in the importance of the physician-patient relationship and the ability to be active participants in their care, to demand access to science-based medical care.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Declaration as of the date first written.

Sign the Declaration:

https://doctorsandscientistsdeclaration.org

“*” indicates required fields

Toronto ER Doctor’s Personal Testimony | DRUTHERS

Toronto ER Doctor’s Personal Testimony | DRUTHERS

HealthScienceUncategorized 4 months ago 11 min read

My name is Mark Trozzi. I am a medical doctor; I graduated in 1990 from The University of Western Ontario. I have been practicing Emergency Medicine for the past twenty-five years, and am a veteran critical resuscitation instructor. I was on call in multiple emergency units since the onset of the so-called “pandemic”, until February 2021, including one ER designated specifically for COVID-19.

What follows is my observations and opinions; I am bound by my personal and religious convictions to speak openly and honestly. I do not have authority to tell you “the truth”, but I will share my honest experiences, perceptions, and digests of hundreds of hours of research on the subject of covid-19.

At the onset of this “pandemic”, I was cautious, and hence meticulous, with N95 mask use, hand washing, social isolation and distancing etc. I studied coronavirus science and was deeply involved in many emergency department drills to modify our practice in profound ways to deal with the “killer virus” we were advertised. However, various things soon made me consider that we were being deceived and manipulated. Here are a few

The First Wave

The “first wave” of the “pandemic” was absolutely the quietest time in my career. I have worked very hard and been very busy over the past twenty-five years in ER. However, both in my regular ER and my “COVID-19 designated” ER, there were almost no patients, and almost no work. I had multiple, long ER shifts without a single patient. Meanwhile, when I would go to the local grocery store, the propagandized public, God bless them, would usher me to the front of the antisocial distance line, thanking me for everything I was going through as a front-line emergency doctor. They believed that the ER’s and hospitals were full of patients dying from covid, and that I must be exhausted and at risk of dying myself from exposure. I began contacting doctors and friends all over Canada and the US, and found the same pattern: empty hospitals, and propaganda saying that they were full of patients dying of covid.

Early Investigation

Early in my studies, I investigated zinc and hydroxychloroquine, which based on sound physiology, may genuinely help those rare persons who get very sick with this cold virus. I was surprised that this treatment was simply brushed aside and dismissed by most of the medical community.

Early Concerns

Researching the World Health Organization, of the UN, I learned that the Chinese dictatorship (PRC) had propped up communist and disreputable “Dr” Tedros, as the head of the WHO. I learned how the PRC had been involved in: the virus release; the cover up for weeks; the disappearing and suppression of honest Chinese doctors and scientist; the spreading of the virus to the world (sparing Beijing where the PRC elite live); and dramatic abuse of the Chinese people in their well-timed lockdown, which was filmed and transmitted to the world to create the panic that herded all of us into surrendering our economies and civil rights.

Foxes Guarding the Henhouse

I learned how Canada’s chief public health officer Dr Tam, is also on the oversight committee of the WHO with Dr Tedros making her, I think, a double agent. I have listened to her often-bizarre dissertations to Canadians regarding covid-19.

My Perception of the Situation

I perceive that at every level, hospital administration has had no apparent choice, other than to submit to the endless top-down roll out from governments, of questionable new rules, protocols, and procedures. My honest conversations with co-workers about my research and observations, became a problem. Caught in this quandary, an important administrator who I greatly respect, told me that “my thoughts made others uncomfortable, and made it difficult to keep everyone motivated and compliant” with all the new protocols and restrictions. Sympathetic to the sad situation, I maintained my clinical position by promising to “bite my tongue any time I thought I was going to speak about COVID-19” in the hospital. This was ultimately ethically impossible for me, and by mid-November I began winding down my ER work, and resigned from all my ER’s by mid-February, to avoid conflicts between my social, legal, and ethical responsibilities; and the hospitals which I am fond of.

Have I Ever Seen a Covid-19 Patient?

In my emergency department work, I have never seen a patient sick with COVID-19; I have seen some positive PCR tests in asymptomatic people, and watched people be imprisoned in their own homes and isolated from family and friends. My research into the PCR test has convinced me personally that it is misleading, manipulatable, and being used to drain endless taxpayer’s money and future debt, to dramatically enrich the very criminals running this scandal. My province alone has performed ~50,000 PCR tests daily. Meanwhile our federal government is bringing in hundreds of thousands of doses of potentially dangerous experimental injections of modified viral genetic material, calling them “vaccines”, and having the military manage them. Is this reasonable for a predominantly mild and non-fatal viral illness?

Information Suppression?

I have watched the suppression of doctors and scientists who performed serum antibody studies, whose findings showed that the virus was much more widespread, yet generally nonfatal, and asymptomatic or very mild in most cases; and that in many regions we had likely already achieved natural herd immunity by summer 2020.

Look at this study performed in Wuhan itself, which shows that the virus was done there by June 1, 2020 just two months after their brief lockdowns ended, and no one was spreading it, not even the very few people with a positive PCR “test” (and they were not sick):

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w

China

I noticed that after China’s theatric lockdown, they quickly went back to business as usual, while all our economies were frozen; they gained tremendous control over the world’s marketplace. It seems a great, though evil, strategy!

Political Manipulation of Health Care Workers

I perceive that many things we learned in medical school about infectious disease have been brushed aside and replaced by constantly expanding lists of — to-me-often-strange — mandates by public health officials. Doctors, nurses, and teachers are especially important to the success of this COVID-19 deception, as we are leaders in society and people trust our advice. So, it is no surprise that I have found free speech and thought have been very suppressed in our ranks. Rather than endure the punishments of dissenting, we can choose to experience the short-sighted perks like extremely quiet days in the ER, replacing our traditional hands-on work with Zoom sessions from home and accessing a variety of new COVID-19 billing codes. At one point, I was offered a position making more money than I normally make working in a busy ER, to just stay home and be available in case the covid swabbing nurse needed to video conference with me.

There are many positive and negative motivators being used to manipulate Canadian doctors, nurses and teachers, to inadvertently participate in this grand covid deception; but this is destroying our society. To use a Titanic metaphor: “even the luxury suites on the Titanic end up at the bottom of the ocean when she sinks”. Also, much of what is being done, including the experimental viral genetic injections, seem to violate the Nuremberg code regarding medical experimentation with full informed consent by the participants.

Doctors and nurses face tough decisions. My career as an emergency physician had always provided me an opportunity to practice my religious and ethical beliefs of honesty and kindness, while making a good living. Now maintaining the career I love would require participating in the deception, violating my oath and spiritual beliefs, and in my opinion committing crimes against humanity as defined by the Nuremberg Code.

I empathize with all my fellow doctors and nurses. We are all victims of the covid abuse.

Deeper Investigation

I researched and perceived how  corrupt oligarchs seem to have planned this crime against humanity. This planning included Event 201 which was a simulation of a corona pandemic conducted by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and Johns Hopkins University in October 2019; and the Rockefeller Foundation’s 2010 Viral outbreak simulation planning called “Operation Lockstep”. Both these projects described how a viral outbreak would be used to bring in an authoritarian system with the loss of our human rights and freedoms. I also observed how their cohorts in big tech like Google, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube worked to censor and deceive us all; it’s genuine propaganda.

Regarding the Use of Face Masks:

The forced wearing of masks by most of the world’s population is not unanimously supported by real science. These masks cause significant harm to our psychological, social, dermatologic, dental, systemic and otolaryngotic health. Though I generally have great health, the masks have given me rashes and nasal symptoms whenever I have had to wear them for prolonged periods, which resolve whenever I do not wear them for a few days. What I find most disturbing is the elimination of facial expressions, and hence normal visual social interaction.

Regarding Covid-19 Vaccinations:

The history of past attempts at vaccines for coronaviruses, revealed some very dangerous side effects in animal models, and the efforts were abandoned. Why would we take a dangerous vaccine for a generally mild illness, to which we develop herd immunity anyway? The current roll-out of fast tracked expensive experimental “vaccines” is burying the taxpayers in endless debt to the rich and powerful villains of this story. Yet, we the people who have been imprisoned and abused in this scandal, are being manipulated into taking strange new injections, in hopes that we might regain some of our freedom. Additionally, most of the so called “vaccines” are not vaccines (unless we change the definition of vaccines). Rather they are injections of Corona virus genes. See the video on this site entitled: This Is Not A Vaccine. (https://drtrozzi.com/2021/01/this-is-not-a-vaccine/)

More Scientific Study

In 2021, I continue in devote time to the study of coronavirus medical science, and geopolitics.

Ivermectin has come to light as an extremely effective safe prevention, prophylaxis, and treatment for covid; yet it has been suppressed by business and political interests, while very expensive and unlawful injections of the masses are under way. Big Pharma and their political consorts are pushing to administer these experimental injections into the world’s population, even infants and children. In reality, the SARS-CoV2 poses very little threat to almost everyone but the very vulnerable persons who are similarly vulnerable to many viruses and other illnesses.

Children have zero risk of death from covid-19 but are being severely damaged by the lockdowns, facial barriers (“masks”), isolation, and denial of many essential elements of childhood. Similarly, almost everyone but the very old or ill, have almost no risk of death or serious injury from coronavirus infection.

It is strongly my diligently researched conclusion that I do not want, nor do I recommend the experimental injections for the vast majority of people. Similarly, I do not support many measures like the “case” count generating PCR “test”, lockdowns, and forced wearing of harmful facial barriers.

Big Pharma is promoting the idea that new variants of SARS-CoV2 will require injections for immunity updates, as well as more fear and lockdowns. However, the most distant variant currently is 99.7% genetically identical to SARS-CoV2. SARS-CoV1 and SARS-CoV2 are only 80% genetically identical, yet we now know that exposure to SARS-CoV1 17 years ago, made people persistently immune to many coronavirus’s including SARS-CoV2 to this day. As experts like Dr Michael Yeadon explain, this makes it virtually impossible that immunity to SARS-CoV2 will not work for one of these subtle variants.

Research within the last year shows that many people, likely well above 50% are immune to SARS-CoV2 without any experimental injection. They are immune due to prior SARS-CoV1 exposure; or exposure to SARS-CoV2 in the past year and a half. Further, SARS-CoV2 is a very mild or asymptomatic experience for about 80% of people, and only a very small percent, less than 0.1 %, are at serious risk from this cold.

Pushing experimental injections on the masses as is currently happening, severely violates the Nuremberg Code for medical experimentation. Many covid protocols are likewise crimes against humanity in violation of the Nuremberg Code, and other legal standards such as civil liberties.

Personal Decisions

To honor the Golden Rule and the Hippocratic Oath, while obeying the Nuremberg Code, I continue committed to my responsibility as a physician, to research thoroughly and share my insights honestly. In the current situation, this requires that I surrender my income, and yet commit my time, energy, and resources to this important work.

I have resigned all my hospital positions thus forfeiting my entire income. I have sold my house and greatly downscaled my family’s standard of living, while surviving on limited savings, and committed myself to do my part to help counter the criminal covid enterprise.

I pray that I may help contribute to an outcome that is true and just, and the return of our free society, and civil liberties. I believe that we are almost all victims in this, regardless of where we are on the path for the recovery of truth.

I am grateful to everyone else doing your part in this fight, and for all forms of support from prayer, to sharing our articles and videos, as well as financial donations.

We have also included some very relaxing music on our site which can be enjoyed for free or purchased to also help support the work we are doing.

Sincere blessings, 

Dr. Mark Trozzi.

This article was originally published on Dr Trozzi’s website at: http://drtrozzi.com

Tony Sayers: 40 Questions To Ask Before Taking The Covid Jab

40 Questions To Ask Yourself Before Taking The “Jab”
1. Name 5 jab ingredients
2. What is MRC-5?
3. What is wi-38?
4. What is glutaraldehyde?
5. What is the UK jab damage payment?
6. What is the 1979 jab damage Payment Act?
7. How has the jab schedule changed since 1979?
8. How much money has been paid out for jab damage?
9. How many doses of how many jabs are in the schedule between birth to age 18?
10. Do jabs contain aborted fetal tissues?
11. Do any jabs contain dog, monkey, pig, or human DNA?
12. What is an adjuvant?
13. What is an antigen?
14. Which arm of the immune system do jabs stimulate?
15. Which arms of the immune system do natural diseases stimulate?
16. What is transverse myelitis?
17. What is encephalopathy?
18. What is the rate of autism in 2019-20, what was it in 2000, and what was it in 1990?
19. What is glyphosate and is it in jabs?
20. If your child is injured by a jab, who will take physical emotional and financial responsibility for that jab?
21. Can you provide an official study that proves jabs are not carcinogenic?
22. Can you provide an official study showing jab versus unjabbed health outcomes? (i.e. any study that shows how healthy jabbed population is compared to unjabbed population)
23. Can you show a safety study proving it is safe to inject multiple jabs?
24. What is shedding?
25. Do jabs shed? Which jabs can shed for up to 6 weeks?
26. Which jabs are live virus jabs?
27. What is the VICP in America?
28. What is SV40?
29. What is MTHFR?
30. What is an acceptable amount of aluminium to ingest per day, and how much is injected by Hepatitis B jab on day 1 of life?
31. Can someone who has been jabbed for pertussis still spread pertussis after being exposed to it, and for how long?
32. What is the death rate for measles in UK from 2001-17?
33. What was the death rate from MMR in UK 2001-17?
34. What does attenuated mean?
35. Have you ever been shown a jab insert before a jab, and have you ever been told of all the side effects listed on that insert?
36. Can the vial stopper cause an allergic reaction?
37. Can there be a serious reaction to jabs?
38. What is vaccineinjuryuk.com?
39. What does the nurse administrating the jabs know about the jab, and can they answer all of your questions?
40. Why do cancer hospitals not allow recently jabbed visitors? Why do they not include unjabbed in the list?

40 Questions To Ask Before Taking The Covid Jab

40 Questions To Ask Before Taking The Covid Jab

Nov 28, 2020
Tony Sayers
8.38K subscribers
https://youtu.be/1YjeYZM755c

Please share far and wide.

With the massive rush through and huge marketing campaign around the most controversial jab in history I thought it was right to get people thinking and asking questions that we all have the right to ask. There should be no reason as to why we are not allowed to simply ask questions when it comes to our own personal health and what we are being forced to put into our body.

Question everything!

my website https://transcendingtimes.org/#

For session enquiries https://transcendingtimes.org/entity-

Email- tony@transcendingtimes.org subscribe to my weekly newsletter- https://transcendingtimes.org/contact/

Other Platforms- https://d.tube/#!/c/tonysayers33

LBRY lbry://@tonysayers#2

BITCHUTE https://www.bitchute.com/channel/2CAu…

Joni Patry: Mercury Retrograde September 27: World Events and What It Means for All 12 Signs + Rahu Changes Into in Krittika: Time of War and Struggles September 19, 2021 – July 12, 2022

“I think that by the time Mercury turns direct, and starts to make heyway in the sign of Virgo (and remember it turns direct October 17th)….but it will continue to be in the sign of Virgo, which is going to be many days after this date that discoveries in health is going to come about. But it’s probably because it NEEDS to come about…because it’s going to be a MASSIVE review and reflection, an explosive period concerning this virus.YES, it’s going to be MASSIVE.” ~Vedic Astrologer Joni Patry
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Mercury Retrograde September 27:
World Events and What It Means for All 12 Signs

Sep 24, 2021
Joni Patry
109K subscribers
https://youtu.be/p_McCp-YQng

Sign up for my FREE Newsletter
http://galacticcenter.org

Buy The New Jewelry Collection!
http://www.galacticcenter.org/shop

Book a Reading with Joni Today!
http://galacticcenter.org/consultations/

Want to learn Vedic Astrology from Joni?
Join my online University of Vedic Astrology to become a certified Master of Vedic Astrology!
http://universityofvedicastrology.com/

My Magazine Website
https://www.astrologicmagazine.com/

Follow me on Instagram
https://www.instagram.com/jonipatry/
Like our Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Joni-P…
Follow us on Twitter
https://twitter.com/JoniPatry

Rahu Changes Into in Krittika:
Time of War and Struggles September 19, 2021 – July 12, 2022

Sep 22, 2021
Joni Patry
109K subscribers

https://youtu.be/oG71r4bAgLo
~

The censorship of Spike Lee’s NYC Epicenters is a tragically fitting end to the last 20 years

The censorship of Spike Lee’s NYC Epicenters is a tragically fitting end to the last 20 years

Ted Walter September 11, 2021
PRINT

Even the respected and dauntless filmmaker Spike Lee could not overcome the awesome wrath of the mainstream media that comes down upon any person of influence who dares challenge the official story of 9/11.

In a span of three days, from August 23rd to 26th, Lee went from staunchly defending his decision to include so-called “9/11 conspiracy theorists” in his eight-hour HBO docuseries, NYC Epicenters 9/11 → 2021½, to removing the entire 30 minutes he had devoted to questioning how the Twin Towers and Building 7 fell. The half-hour was part of the final two-hour episode set to air on the night of the 20th anniversary of 9/11.

Unbeknownst to most people — because only members of the media got to view the episode and declare it unfit for the public to see — the 30 minutes of excised material included far more than just interviews with so-called “fringe architects.” (Actually, there were upwards of 10 architects and engineers, ranging from a San Francisco high-rise architect to a fellow of the Society of Fire Protection Engineers.) There were also interviews with 9/11 family members who believe they have not been told the truth about the murder of their loved ones and with first responders and survivors who witnessed explosions. Along with all those interviews was a wealth of archival footage and radio dispatches from that morning, in which rescuer after rescuer can be heard reporting explosions. (Full disclosure: I was also interviewed for the film.)

Instead of painting a full and accurate picture of the now-excised section, the media seized upon the inclusion of “conspiracy group” Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth and our founder Richard Gage — who, in the words of Slate editor Jeremy Stahl, “is responsible for peddling some of the most pernicious and long-running lies about the 9/11 attacks.”

Stahl’s choice of words was clearly intended to imply, falsely, that Gage does not actually believe the view he is presenting but is, rather, knowingly perpetuating a lie for some nefarious purpose. Any person practicing real journalism who has interviewed Gage “multiple times” could not plausibly claim that Gage is lying. What Stahl was practicing was propaganda, the express goal of which was to stop millions of viewers from seeing the half-hour of documentary film that Lee made.

The death blow to Lee’s attempt to shine a light on the Twin Towers’ and Building 7’s controlled demolition appears to have been Stahl’s reporting of statements that Gage made in the past year in which he called the coronavirus pandemic a “hoax” and aired other related views about vaccines and Bill Gates. Stahl also loosely accused Gage of being anti-Semitic — or of condoning anti-Semitism — for having tolerated suggestions, made by an audience member in 2012 and by a podcast host more recently, that Israel’s Mossad was involved in the 9/11 attacks.

Less than 24 hours after Stahl’s Slate article was published, news broke that Lee was “back in the editing room” reexamining the final chapter of the series. One day later, HBO announced that the entire half-hour had been cut.

If Lee had any say in the decision, I suspect he did what he did because he felt he could not defend keeping Gage, nor did he care to, and he didn’t have time for the massive edit that would have been required to remove Gage, who was central to the section. It may be that all of the other attacks did not faze him at all. However, the current narrative is that Lee capitulated to the totality of the media’s condemnation over featuring so-called “conspiracy theorists.”

At the height of the controversy and since, countless articles have been published referring to the controlled demolition theory as “debunked.” These articles either have no links to any sources, or they have links to Popular Mechanics articles from 10 years ago or more, or they have links to the very reports and FAQs issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology that are disputed by thousands of architects, engineers, and scientists. (By the way, Lee and others make the point that fire isn’t hot enough to melt steel because there was molten metal at Ground Zero, not because the steel needed to melt for the buildings to collapse. This fact, as with all of the evidence of controlled demolition, has not been debunked.)

A journalist friend at a serious investigative news outlet recently told me that on any other issue, relying on the articles of a pop-science magazine like Popular Mechanics to claim that a particular argument had been “debunked,” without doing one’s own research, would not pass as legitimate journalism. But when it comes to mainstream reporting of challenges to the official story of 9/11, we are not talking about journalism but propaganda.

Indeed, for the past 20 years, the mainstream media have revealed themselves — at least those who have done the writing and editing about this issue — to be nothing more than a cult of denialists and propagandists when it comes to addressing what really happened on 9/11. The dictionary definition of a cult is “a group or sect bound together by veneration of the same thing, person, or ideal, etc.” In this case, that thing is the official story of 9/11.

Thus, the media’s response to Lee’s positive portrayal of controlled demolition proponents was especially swift and ferocious because it represented a profound threat to the object of their veneration.

Not only was the half-hour too compelling, thanks to Lee’s “extraordinary directorial panache” and his inclusion of sympathetic figures like Bob McIlvaine, who believes an explosion killed his son while he was entering the North Tower, but Lee himself is about the most terrifying messenger the media could have imagined.

Here is a man who is generally beloved by a wide cross section of the American public, from film buffs to sports fans to the Black community to progressives and beyond. He recently returned from being president of the Cannes Film Festival jury. He has produced and directed dozens of films, many of them highly acclaimed. And now he has just created seven-and-a-half hours of “exuberant,” “brilliant,” “poignant” documentary storytelling about Covid-19 and 9/11.

How could it be that Lee believes so strongly the Twin Towers and Building 7 were brought down with explosives that he wanted to dedicate essentially the final 30 minutes of his HBO docuseries to exploring, if not advocating, that view?

Unable to even imagine the possibility of Lee and his guests being right, the media was forced to rationalize that Lee simply went off the deep end for a moment, “fraternizing with the truthers” on a “pet project” and almost committing a “career-defining offense,” in the words of The New Yorker’s Doreen St. Félix.

Controlled demolition denialism is so engrained in the culture of the media that an entire generation of young writers like St. Félix, who was eight years old in 2001, simply take at face value, without any curiosity or questions or serious research, the notion that the controlled demolition theory has been debunked. Somehow, they manage to look at the collapse of Building 7 and harbor no doubt whatsoever that fire brought it down. Such is the power of 20 years of propaganda that otherwise intelligent people like St. Félix end up doing the bidding — I will assume unwittingly — of whoever perpetrated the 9/11 attacks.

In the face of this relentless and dehumanizing propaganda machine, Lee’s intention to give voice to advocates of the controlled demolition theory on the 20th anniversary of 9/11 should be seen as a testament to the millions of hours of hard work put in by tens of thousands of activists over the past two decades (including those at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth). Lee was ever-so-close to elevating their message to unseen heights and possibly creating a turning point in the now two-decades-long fight for truth and justice.

But it was almost too good to be true, at least right now. The censorship of Spike Lee’s documentary about 9/11 on the 20th anniversary of that day — when a conspicuous 90 minutes will air on HBO instead of two hours — is a tragically fitting end to the last 20 years of perpetual war, cover-up, and propaganda that have led to an unprecedented level of distrust of public institutions.

Let us hope and do everything we can to ensure that the next 20 years will be different. There is little doubt in the minds of most people that the current trajectory of our society is unsustainable. Exposing the truth about 9/11 is essential to changing that trajectory.


Ted Walter is the director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. He has authored several publications and writings on behalf of the organization, including the 2020 request for correction to NIST’s final report on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, which is now the subject of an ongoing lawsuit against NIST.

Photograph by Satchel Lee/Courtesy HBO.Tweet

“I’ve seen incredible acts of heroism” – 9/11 Firefighter Blows WTC 7 Cover Up Wide Open

MUST SEE/HEAR!!!  #NYC #Firefighter Rudy Dent, a former Fire Marshall with 32 years experience who witnessed the #detonation of #WTCBuilding7 calls out 9/11 as a #FalseFlagOperation -tells us what our next steps are, and why we must fight until the people actually responsible are “arrested for Treason!” #911Truth


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
tarot by janine @MorigeauJanine · 20h

9/11 Firefighter Blows WTC 7 Cover Up Wide Open


“I’ve seen incredible acts of heroism, I love my fellow firefighters, we love each other, and I’m dedicated to exposing this False Flag that took their lives.”


Re: NYFD affected who are still working: “They cannot comment, I’m retired…”


~
@ForeverUnlimitedConsciousness✨

Recent MonkeyWerxUS Military Flight Analysis

Monkey observes and explains who/what/where in terms of military flights tracked, TFRs, VIPs, etc., Immigration issues.  Infiltration, not invasion. More Americans should be paying attention, and be careful what you wish for. We all come from immigrants, we welcome assimilation but do not wish to have our way of life obliterated or restricted. We need safe and sane immigration policies.

A friend who has been a citizen for a few years has been trying to get his wife and children here legally from Serbia for years, working 3 jobs. Yet people come in unvetted on flights and across an unrestricted border. I told him to send them to Mexico, to cross the border, they’ll get housing, food card and education for his kids.

We should be observing and supporting our Australian Patriots, who are under their 6th Lockdown and rebeling with protests. They already have these types of quarantine camps, supposedly due to COVID but possibly for dissidents and anti-establishment types. Which may turn out to be everyone in the country if the government continues the harsh and unnecessary restrictions.

Are these future Camps for Patriots?

Sep 9, 2021
Monkey Werx US
541K subscribers

https://youtu.be/IzJt0WEGHcQ


For Monkey Werx gear and products, go to https://www.monkeywerxus.com/shop

You can help support the channel and watch live SITREPs at https://www.patreon.com/monkeywerxus

Socials:
https://www.instagram.com/monkeywerxus/

https://www.facebook.com/MonkeyWerxUS

©2021 Monkey Werx. All rights reserved.
Do not duplicate in any form without permission from Monkey Werx.

Is the Government Deporting Hispanics?

Sep 7, 2021
Monkey Werx US
541K subscribers
https://youtu.be/tD86DdMDpQ0

Welcome to AfghaniMex

Sep 4, 2021
Monkey Werx US
541K subscribers
https://youtu.be/4lQuJecT9H8